You are facilitating a self-help group for individuals recovering from gambling addiction. The group operates under a peer-led model, with an emphasis on mutual support and shared responsibility for maintaining group norms. One of the group’s foundational rules is confidentiality: what is shared in the group stays in the group.
During a session, a new member, Mike, becomes emotional while sharing about his significant financial struggles, including a large gambling debt. Later that evening, an established member,
Rachel, privately contacts you and reveals that she recognized Mike as her neighbor. She confesses that she is considering warning their mutual landlord, as she believes Mike might struggle to pay rent and could face eviction, potentially affecting other tenants.
You are now faced with a complex ethical issue. Although the group’s rules clearly state that confidentiality must be maintained, Rachel is not bound by professional ethical codes, and you have limited authority to enforce the group’s norms outside of meetings. Additionally, Rachel’s intentions appear to stem from genuine concern, but her actions could severely harm Mike’s trust in the group and his willingness to participate.
What steps will you take to address this situation?
