:
Activity-Based Costing: Enhancing Cost Efficiency and Decision-Making in Modern Organizations
The Problem Under Investigation
Traditional costing methods often fail to provide an accurate reflection of the costs associated with individual products or services, particularly in organizations with diverse and complex operations. These methods typically allocate overhead costs based on a single volume measure, such as labor or machine hours, which can lead to distorted cost allocations and uninformed strategic decisions. Such inaccuracies often result in unprofitable product lines being subsidized by more profitable ones, ultimately leading to financial inefficiencies and potential competitive disadvantages.
The Importance of the Study
This study is significant because Activity-Based Costing (ABC) offers a transformative approach to overcoming the limitations of traditional costing systems. By assigning costs based on actual resource consumption, ABC provides a more granular understanding of cost structures and profitability. The insights gained through ABC implementation can lead to more informed pricing, product mix, and operational decisions. In today’s competitive business environment, where resource optimization and cost efficiency are critical, understanding the benefits and challenges of ABC is vital for organizations aiming to achieve long-term sustainability.
Furthermore, as industries increasingly adopt sophisticated technologies and face global competition, traditional costing methods may no longer suffice. Investigating ABC’s role in this context contributes to the broader understanding of cost management practices and their impact on organizational success.
The Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this research is to examine the implementation and impact of Activity-Based Costing on organizational decision-making and operational efficiency. This study will analyze how ABC improves cost allocation accuracy, identifies inefficiencies, and supports strategic decision-making. The research aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of ABC’s advantages and limitations, offering practical recommendations for organizations considering its adoption.
Main Participants in the Study
The study will focus on case examples from organizations across various industries, such as manufacturing, healthcare, and retail, where ABC has been implemented. Specific emphasis will be placed on companies with diverse product portfolios and complex production processes, as these are most likely to benefit from ABC’s detailed cost analysis. Interviews with accounting managers, financial analysts, and operational managers will provide insights into the practical challenges and benefits experienced during ABC adoption.
References
Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2020). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (16th ed.). Pearson.
Kaplan, R. S., & Anderson, S. R. (2007). Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing: A Simpler and More Powerful Path to Higher Profits. Harvard Business Review Press.
Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (1991). Profit priorities from activity-based costing. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 130–135.
Banker, R. D., Bardhan, I. R., & Chen, T. (2008). The role of manufacturing practices in mediating the impact of activity-based costing on plant performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(1), 1–19.
Blocher, E., Stout, D., & Cokins, G. (2021). Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Turney, P. B. B. (2005). Activity-Based Costing: An Emerging Foundation for Performance Management. Cost Technology.
Maiga, A. S., & Jacobs, F. A. (2003). Balanced scorecard, activity-based costing, and company performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(3), 283–301.
