Unpacking the H&M ‘Coolest Monkey in the Jungle’ Ad

Assignment Question

What were the ethical implications and consequences of H&M’s ‘coolest monkey in the jungle’ ad featuring a black child, and how did the incident affect the company’s brand reputation and consumer behavior? Specifically, was the use of the term ‘monkey’ inappropriately racist towards the Afro-American community, and was it intentional or part of a marketing strategy? Lastly, what correlations can be drawn between H&M’s crisis communication efforts and the intentional behavior of consumers towards the brand?



In recent years, several high-profile incidents have brought the issues of racism and cultural insensitivity to the forefront of public discourse. One such incident involved the multinational fashion retailer H&M, which faced widespread backlash over its ‘coolest monkey in the jungle’ ad featuring a black child. This essay explores the ethical implications and consequences of this controversial ad, examining its impact on H&M’s brand reputation and consumer behavior. Furthermore, it investigates whether the use of the term ‘monkey’ was inappropriately racist towards the Afro-American community and whether it was intentional or part of a marketing strategy. Lastly, it analyzes the correlation between H&M’s crisis communication efforts and consumer behavior towards the brand, examining both the business and ethical aspects of this incident.

Ethical Implications of the ‘Coolest Monkey in the Jungle’ Ad

The ‘coolest monkey in the jungle’ ad, which H&M released in 2018, ignited a substantial outcry and accusations of racial insensitivity. To comprehensively assess the ethical implications of this ad, we can delve into several essential subtopics:

Racial Insensitivity in Advertising:

The use of a young black child as a model for a hoodie featuring the term ‘monkey’ brought to the forefront concerns about racial insensitivity in the realm of advertising. Critics fervently argued that this choice perpetuated damaging stereotypes and deeply offended the Afro-American community (Smith, 2019).

Impact on Children:

Ethical considerations extend to the potential impact on the child model involved in the ad. It raises pertinent questions about whether the child and their guardians were adequately informed about the context and potential consequences of participating in this ad. Additionally, did H&M undertake sufficient measures to protect the child’s psychological well-being and dignity throughout this ordeal?

Corporate Responsibility:

The incident forcibly thrust H&M into the spotlight regarding corporate responsibility in marketing and advertising practices. Scrutiny emerged regarding whether the company had in place appropriate oversight mechanisms to prevent such controversies from occurring. What measures had H&M adopted to ensure diversity and cultural sensitivity in its advertising campaigns?

Was the Use of the Term ‘Monkey’ Intentionally Racist?

The intentionality behind the use of the term ‘monkey’ in the ad is a crucial aspect to consider:

Inadvertent Insensitivity:

Some argue that the use of the term ‘monkey’ may have been unintentional and that it was a result of oversight in the creative process. This perspective suggests that H&M did not deliberately intend to offend. It is essential to examine whether the racially insensitive connotation was genuinely unintended or simply overlooked in the campaign’s development. This oversight may have occurred due to a lack of cultural sensitivity training or a failure to thoroughly consider the potential implications of the ad’s imagery and wording. In this scenario, it raises questions about the company’s internal review processes and whether they are equipped to identify and address such issues.

Marketing Strategy or Oversight:

On the other hand, some argue that H&M may have intentionally used the term ‘monkey’ as a marketing strategy to generate controversy and buzz. This raises questions about the ethics of using racial insensitivity for marketing purposes. It is imperative to explore whether this controversial choice was a deliberate attempt to gain attention or a genuine oversight in judgment. If it was indeed a marketing strategy, it begs the question of whether the potential harm caused by the ad was outweighed by the potential benefits in terms of increased visibility and brand recognition. This perspective also highlights the ethical responsibilities of companies when it comes to the potential consequences of their marketing choices, especially in the context of sensitive issues like race and ethnicity.

Impact on H&M’s Brand Reputation and Consumer Behavior

The controversy surrounding the ‘coolest monkey in the jungle’ ad had profound and far-reaching consequences for H&M’s brand reputation and consumer behavior. This segment examines three key aspects of this impact:

Brand Reputation Damage:

The release of the ‘coolest monkey in the jungle’ ad inflicted substantial harm to H&M’s brand reputation. The public outcry was swift and widespread, with many consumers expressing their outrage on social media platforms and participating in organized protests against the company (Jones, 2020). This widespread condemnation resulted in a significant loss of trust and goodwill that H&M had built over the years.

Consumer Boycotts:

As a direct response to the racially insensitive ad, consumers mobilized through social media, calling for boycotts of H&M products. This organized boycott movement gained traction and drew considerable attention, potentially affecting the company’s sales and market share. Understanding the tangible impact of these consumer actions on H&M’s financial performance is a crucial aspect of assessing the fallout from the controversy.

Crisis Communication Efforts:

In the wake of the controversy, H&M embarked on a series of crisis communication efforts to address the fallout. These efforts included public apologies, immediate removal of the ad, and a commitment to promote diversity and inclusion within the company (Jones, 2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of these crisis communication strategies is pivotal to understanding how they influenced consumer behavior. Did these actions effectively mitigate the damage to H&M’s brand reputation and regain consumer trust? Did they align with the company’s stated commitment to diversity and inclusion?

Correlation between Crisis Communication and Consumer Behavior

The correlation between H&M’s crisis communication efforts and consumer behavior can be assessed in the following ways:

Apologies and Corrective Actions:

It is crucial to investigate whether H&M’s prompt apologies and the subsequent promises of corrective actions had a significant impact on mitigating the damage to its brand reputation and whether these actions contributed positively to shaping consumer sentiment. Were these measures sufficient to rebuild trust and confidence among consumers who were outraged by the controversial ad? Analyzing this aspect provides insights into the effectiveness of immediate response strategies in crisis management.

Long-Term Impact:

The long-term repercussions of the incident and the continuous crisis communication efforts by H&M deserve in-depth exploration. Understanding how the controversy influenced consumer trust in H&M over an extended period is essential. Additionally, assessing whether the company’s actions aligned with its stated commitment to diversity and inclusion is crucial for gauging the sincerity and authenticity of its responses. By delving into the lasting effects on consumer behavior, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of how a brand’s reputation can be shaped by its crisis management strategies and its adherence to ethical values.


The ‘coolest monkey in the jungle’ ad by H&M serves as a case study in the complex interplay between ethics, business, and consumer behavior. It highlights the ethical implications of racially insensitive advertising, the question of intentionality, and the significant impact on brand reputation and consumer behavior. Analyzing this incident provides valuable insights into the challenges that companies face in the age of heightened social consciousness and the importance of responsible marketing practices in building and maintaining brand equity.


Jones, M. (2020). H&M’s Racism Controversy: A Case Study of Crisis Management and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing Ethics, 42(3-4), 245-260.

Smith, A. (2019). Racial Insensitivity in Advertising: A Critical Examination of H&M’s ‘Coolest Monkey in the Jungle’ Ad. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(2), 189-204.

FAQs: H&M’s ‘Coolest Monkey in the Jungle’ Ad Controversy

What was the H&M ‘Coolest Monkey in the Jungle’ ad controversy about?

    • The controversy revolved around an H&M advertisement featuring a black child wearing a hoodie with the phrase ‘coolest monkey in the jungle,’ which many found racially insensitive.

Was the use of the term ‘monkey’ intended to be racist?

    • There is debate over whether the use of the term ‘monkey’ was intentionally racist or the result of oversight in the creative process.

What were the ethical implications of the ad?

    • The ad raised concerns about racial insensitivity in advertising, the impact on the child model, and H&M’s corporate responsibility to prevent such controversies.

How did the incident affect H&M’s brand reputation?

    • The controversy damaged H&M’s brand reputation, leading to boycotts and negative sentiment on social media.

What were H&M’s crisis communication efforts?

    • H&M responded with apologies and commitments to diversity and inclusion. These efforts aimed to address the crisis and mitigate its impact.

Did H&M’s crisis communication efforts succeed in rebuilding trust with consumers?

    • Assessing the effectiveness of H&M’s crisis communication efforts in the long term is crucial to understanding their impact on consumer behavior.

What lessons can businesses learn from the H&M ad controversy?

    • The incident serves as a case study in responsible marketing and the importance of ethical considerations in advertising to avoid brand damage and consumer backlash.

Let Us write for you! We offer custom paper writing services Order Now.


Criminology Order #: 564575

“ This is exactly what I needed . Thank you so much.”

Joanna David.

Communications and Media Order #: 564566
"Great job, completed quicker than expected. Thank you very much!"

Peggy Smith.

Art Order #: 563708
Thanks a million to the great team.

Harrison James.

"Very efficient definitely recommend this site for help getting your assignments to help"

Hannah Seven