After completing Assignment Fourteen, respond to the following:
1.
Present to the board ONE of the forensic constructs you wrote about in
your assignment (i.e., risk, danger, antisociality, personality,
psychopathy, urges, sex offenses, etc). Explain to the board how the
clinical construct you wrote about is relevant to the case study.
Explain the relevance – in detail – of the construct you chose to the
case.
Cite from the Valle videos using in-text time-stamps.
2.
Present to the board your stance regarding the idea that Valle was
charged based on thoughts he had; not actions. Defend, either way,
(perhaps based on MacCulloch versus Schlesinger’s points) whether or not
Valle’s acquittal is proper. Should he have been found guilty? If so,
of what? Defend your stance. Should he have been found not guilty?
Defend your stance.
Same links for Assignment 14:
-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJa8GNlunZY
– https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hAFIBwsu-M
– https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-2nd-circuit/1719750.html
– https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/12/04/cannibal-cop-cleared-in-court-again/
– https://truecrimedaily.com/2017/05/02/gilberto-valle-discusses-cannibal-cop-case-with-crime-watch-daily/
Please make sure to use evidence to support your answer and cite in apa format.