Aprox 250 words- What could be wrong with a flat-out rejection of mystical experience? Why might it be important to consider other perspectives when it comes to mysticism? Please be sure to justify your response by including how James, Russell, or Watts would based on the readings in Chapter 14 view your argument. Answer each question seperatly 1.) What does James mean when he uses the term ineffable? 2.) According to Russell mysticism sees evil as illusory. What does he mean by this? What is his criticism? 3.) Should mystical experiences be considered true? Please answer using the position of either James or Watts and state whether you agree and why/why not. 4.) What does Watts mean when he says, If we are unduly absorbed in improving them [our lives] we may forget altogether to live them (596)? In your opinion is this a spiritual sentiment? Defend your answer. 5.) According to Russell the mystic relies on instinct. What troubles him about this? In your opinion, are the mystics experiences based on reason or intuition? Why is this an important distinction to make?
