Objective:
This assignment aims to encourage critical thinking and reflection on moral development, parenting styles, and the impact of personal spirituality and meaning in ethical decision-making.
Background:
Understanding how personal values and spiritual beliefs intersect with ethical dilemmas is essential for holistic development. This assignment uses the case of Julian, a 10-year-old boy faced with a moral and ethical challenge, to explore these intersections.
Scenario:
Julian is passionate about arts and crafts and has been tasked with creating a model of a historical monument for a school project. He has planned and anticipated the crafting process with excitement. However, his father, Mr. Anderson, presents him with a professionally made model to ensure he gets the best grade, causing a conflict for Julian between integrity and guaranteed success.
Questions for Consideration:
Personal Decision:
What would you do if you were in Julian’s shoes? Be honest, and explain your reasoning.
Moral Assessment:
Is it right for Julian to use the professionally made model? Why or why not?
How might peers, teachers, or other family members view his decision?
How might Julian feel about himself and his achievements if he uses the model?
Theoretical Analysis:
Analyze Julian’s dilemma using Kohlberg’s stages of moral development and Gilligan’s ethics of care. How do these theories inform what Julian should do?
How does Frankl’s notion of finding meaning through challenges apply here?
Parenting Styles and Spiritual Values:
What does Mr. Anderson’s decision to give Julian the model suggest about his parenting style? How might his parent’s approach affect Julian’s moral development and his understanding of hard work, integrity, and authenticity?
Personal Reflection:
How do your personal beliefs guide your decision-making in ethical dilemmas?
To receive full credit for this assignment, your responses must be complete, reflective, and demonstrate thoughtful engagement with the questions posed. Each answer should provide a comprehensive exploration of the issues, integrate theoretical insights appropriately, and reflect a deep personal engagement with the ethical dilemmas presented. Superficial or incomplete responses will not meet the criteria for full credit. Ensure that your submission captures both your educational insights and your personal reflections accurately and thoroughly.
