Instructions: You should complete this assignment after studying the learning material for Unit 10 and completing the practice quiz for that unit. Find the case Haaretz.com v. Goldhar , 2018 SCC 28, on the CanLII website. Read the headnote and the judgment of Justice Côté (paragraphs 1–98). Answer the following questions: What is the meaning of the legal principle of forum non conveniens? Explain in your own words. What factors (elements relating to the principle) did Justice Côté consider when applying the principle of forum non conveniens in the case? What is the meaning of “libel [defamation] tourism” as mentioned in this case? What is the meaning of lex locus delicti as it is used in this case? Explain in your own words. Why was it considered in this case? What was the result of the decision and what were the consequences for Mr. Goldhar? Do you agree or disagree with the result? What are your thoughts about your own online activities after reading this decision?
