Book Critique Rubric NewBook Critique Rubric NewCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBook CitedThe book is cited at the beginning of the critique.20 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAt Least One Review From A Peer Reviewed JournalOne review is from a peer reviewed journal.40 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMore Than One Review From A Peer reviewed Journaltwo or more reviews are from peer reviewed journals.20 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBook and Reviews Cited CorrectlyBook and reviews are cited at the beginning of the critique and are cited correctly according to the assignment guidelines.20 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblems, Sources, Method Discussed At LengthNot too brief. Problems are clearly identified. There are examples of specific sources. There is discussion of methods in detail.40 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAt Least Four Major ThesesThere are clearly four major theses. They are set apart in quotes or italics.40 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMajor Theses Are Not From Pages Near Each OtherMajor Theses are from throughout the book. Major theses have page number or location (in parentheses) after them.20 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMajor Theses Are Important IdeasThey reflect the problems identified. They are not just basic facts.40 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStudent Comments Show Student Understands The Major Theses.Student comments on the major theses are not too brief. They indicate the student grasps the major theses or reveal important insights the student has about the major theses.40 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Dialogue Shows Impact of the BookThe scholarly dialogue section shows the impact the book has or does not have on understanding the problems. The reviews are not from the same journal but from different ones.40 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNo Factual ErrorsCritique contains no factual errors by the student40 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWell Written No Grammatical ErrosCritique is well written and has no grammatical errors such as run on sentences, misspellings, one sentence paragraphs, or other grammatical or writing errors.40 ptsFull Marks0 ptsNo Marks40 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDigital EthicsUses and shares information, including documents, pictures, programs and personal/private information, in an ethical and legal manner.threshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsMastering3 ptsAchieving2 ptsDeveloping1 ptsEmerging–This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDigital Tool ProficiencyEmploys digital tools and platforms to complete tasks.threshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsMastering3 ptsAchieving2 ptsDeveloping1 ptsEmerging–This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation CredibilityEvaluates credibility of online information sources, assessing information for potential biases or inaccuracies.threshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsMastering3 ptsAchieving2 ptsDeveloping1 ptsEmerging–This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInvestigationUses effective search strategies and appropriate databases to access and interpret relevant online information.threshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsMastering3 ptsAchieving2 ptsDeveloping1 ptsEmerging–Total Points: 400
