You determine your chosen area very early on. It would be nice to see if there were other areas of interest to you and why you chose the topic you did. You demonstrate some good research to identify design opportunities on your chosen topic. Ensure that all claims within the text are referenced in the appropriate style. Your reflection and evaluation of the research could give more insight into the drawbacks of the other telehealth approaches you outline. RESEARCH METHODS: You have used questionnaires as a primary data method. However there is insufficient information on how (or why) this was implemented and the learning and outcomes from it. What were you asking people and why? Was this to understand the problem or to help develop a solution? What other methods could you have used to explore this? CRITICAL EVALUATION: Further evaluation is needed within the report, particularly around your learnings from the research. I would encourage you to think about the impact of your design solution (both negative and positive) And link this evaluation back to the needs outlined earlier in the document. SKILLS, CREATIVE DESIGN, REALISATION: You arrived at the final outcome very quickly and do not present enough of earlier iterations or potential solutions. I would encourage you to include more of the user journey into your prototyping and development. More detail is given to the style of the outcome than to the content or user specification- revisit this. You reference moodboards and visuals that arent included in the report, please include these. Be critical about the outcomes and things that could be refined if you were to make it again. REPORT + REFERENCING: The layout of report has been well considered. Your conclusion / evaluation is quite brief. References incorrectly formatted. Too many web based references – you need to be more diverse. Revisit this. I have also attach my project brief I will like to know if this work can be edited based on the feedback or it has to be rewritten
