Rights & Responsibilities in History. To study rights and responsibilities in history, we must ask questions. Who decides who has rights? Does everyone have the same rights? Who decides on the limits individuals should or should not have? Why?
What led to establishing certain rights, and to whom were they given?
How have people, governments, or institutions decided what parameters should be set to enforce responsibilities? How are such decisions justified?
The key to this theme is addressing BOTH rights AND responsibilities. These are two powerful forces in history, but one does not work without the other.
Rights are freedoms or privileges that individuals possess as human beings or as citizens of a society. They are often, though not always, protected by laws, charters, or constitutions that establish the boundaries of personal freedoms (rights) and protections and obligations (responsibilities). › Civil rights: nonpolitical rights of individuals that their governments (through law) are bound to protect. They can include: › Freedom of speech: the right to speak freely (within reason). Responsibilities are expectations of individuals as members of society. These include laws, social norms, or ethical principles designed to promote the well-being of society as a whole. › Legal responsibilities: the duty to maintain order and justice within a society.
They include obeying the law, paying taxes, and respecting the rights of others. By following the laws, societies can function, and the rights of others are protected. › Civic responsibilities: the obligation to participate (directly or indirectly) in the functioning of a government. They can include voting, staying informed about political issues, and engaging in community activities. › Social responsibilities: the commitment to treat others respectfully and kindly and to help those in need. Examples include volunteering in the community or establishing organizations that support others. ›
Ethical responsibilities: the charge to make morally sound choices and decisions—even when driven by personal values and principles rather than being demanded by law—and making decisions between the right and wrong.
