nalysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Develop a 2 to 3 page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following: Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected {A national healthcare issue that I have selected is workplace violence against nurses. }. and its impact on your organization.
Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization). Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations. Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected.
Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples. rubrics Assignment_Rubric NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Develop a 2-3 page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing the selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting.
Be sure to address the following: ·
Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. · Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization). 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent The response accurately and thoroughly describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …
The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed evidence/data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. 22 to >19.0 pts Good The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …The response includes accurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. …
The response includes vague or inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. 17 to >0 pts Poor The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization or is missing. …The response includes vague and inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected or is missing. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome · Provide a summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources, on the national healthcare issue/stressor. · Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations. 30 to >26.0 pts Excellent Response includes a complete, detailed, and specific summary of two outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …
The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations. 26 to >23.0 pts Good Response includes an accurate summary of two outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations. 23 to >20.0 pts Fair Response includes a vague or inaccurate or incomplete summary of outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response vaguely or inaccurately explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations. 20 to >0 pts Poor Response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of outside resources (articles) reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected or summary is missing. …
The response vaguely and inaccurately explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations or explanation is missing. 30 pts Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. ·
Explain how the strategies may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples. 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Response includes a complete, detailed, and accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …Response accurately and thoroughly explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively, with specific and accurate examples for each. 22 to >19.0 pts Good Response includes an accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …
Response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively with at least one specific example for each. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair Response includes a vague or inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor. …Response vaguely or inaccurately explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively. …Response may include some vague or inaccurate examples. 17 to >0 pts Poor Response provides a vague and inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor or summary is missing. …
Response vaguely and inaccurately explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively or explanation is missing. …Response does not include any examples. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Resource Synthesis 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources. 4 to >3.0 pts Good Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource. 3 to >2.0 pts Fair Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources. 2 to >0 pts Poor The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used. 5 pts
