To prepare for this Assignment: Review the Capstone Paper Assignment GuideDownload Capstone Paper Assignment Guide Locate the most current version of your Week 4 Assignment. You will add these sections to that document. Review the new expectations for Use of evidence and Credit to Source: http://academLinks to an external site.icguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoiceLinks to an external site. http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/scholarlywriting#s-lg-box-2773859Links to an external site. Review the Walden University Writing Center webpage: Using Evidence: SynthesisLinks to an external site. Review the Week 5 Assignment Rubric Review Chapter 5 in your Spath text for examples of practice improvement plans. Spath, P. (2018). Introduction to healthcare quality management (3rd ed.). Health Administration Press. Refer to Writing Center guidelines for how to write a summary. Write a 3–4-page paper that addresses the following: Introduction. Briefly review your practice problem and include a purpose statement. Include data to support the problem. Evidence-Based Practice Plan Explanation (Completed in Week 4) Provide a detailed explanation of the evidence-based practice quality improvement plan that you will use to address the practice problem. Support your plan with scholarly references (the sources you found in the analysis of the evidence). Resources (new in Week 5) Describe the resources needed to support the change in practice such as personnel time, supplies for staff education, cost of new equipment, or cost of software. Explain why each resource is necessary. Conclusion Discuss all key points addressed in this assignment. BY DAY 7 Submit your Assignment SUBMISSION INFORMATION Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review. Rubric NURS_4220_Week5_Assignment_Rubric NURS_4220_Week5_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Content: Provided a detailed explanation of the evidence-based practice quality improvement plan used to address the practice problem. 60 to >49.0 pts Excellent Provided a fully developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. 49 to >39.0 pts Proficient Provided a developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 39 to >29.0 pts Basic Provided a minimally developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 29 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Provided an under-developed evidence-based practice performance improvement plan with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. 60 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Content: Described resources that will be needed to support the change in practice and explained why each resource is necessary. 40 to >35.0 pts Excellent Provided a fully developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. 35 to >31.0 pts Proficient Provided a developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 31 to >27.0 pts Basic Provided a minimally developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 27 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Provided an under-developed explanation of resources used to support the plan and why each resource is needed with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. 40 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Content: Provided a comprehensive concluding summary with no new additional information included. 20 to >14.0 pts Excellent Provided a fully developed summary with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues. 14 to >10.0 pts Proficient Provided a developed summary with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues. 10 to >5.0 pts Basic Provided a minimally developed summary with limited analysis of concepts and related issues. 5 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Provided an under-developed summary with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Clarity, Flow, and Organization 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Content is free from spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates very well-formed sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is completely clear, logical, and well-organized. 8 to >7.0 pts Proficient Content contains minor spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Content presented is mostly clear, logical, and well-organized. 7 to >6.0 pts Basic Content contains moderate spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing demonstrates adequate sentence and paragraph structure and may require some editing. Content presented is adequately clear, logical, and/or organized, but could benefit from additional editing/revision. 6 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Content contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors. Writing does not demonstrate adequate sentence and paragraph structure and requires additional editing/proofreading. Key sections of presented content lack clarity, logical flow, and/or organization. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Context, Audience, Purpose, and Tone 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Content clearly demonstrates awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free from bias, and style is appropriate for the professional setting/workplace context. 8 to >7.0 pts Proficient Content demonstrates satisfactory awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. 7 to >6.0 pts Basic Content demonstrates basic awareness of context, audience, and purpose. Tone is somewhat professional, scholarly, and/or free from bias, and style is mostly consistent with the professional setting/workplace context. 6 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Content minimally or does not demonstrate awareness of context, audience, and/or purpose. Writing is not reflective of professional/scholarly tone and/or is not free of bias. Style is inconsistent with the professional setting/workplace context and reflects the need for additional editing. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing: Originality, Source Credibility, and Attribution of Ideas 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Content reflects original thought and writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. 8 to >7.0 pts Proficient Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. 7 to >6.0 pts Basic Content somewhat reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing somewhat demonstrates adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and references. 6 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Content does not adequately reflect original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates inconsistent adherence to reference requirements, including the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate source attribution (when applicable) and reference.
