I need a paper written over an outline that focuses on using Zoom as a communication tool within my organization. I have attached the outline I have so far but, it was just thrown together. Please start from scratch and use the thesis because that part is right. Please follow the outline attached and use the references I used. The rubric is below I will also send the feedback given from the teacher Week 6 Assignment – Creating the Bones of Your Argument Criteria Ratings Pts Develop an outline that clearly describes the main points (causes of the problem, effects, and potential solution) along with the supporting points (benefits and risks), and include evidence to support the main and supporting points. view longer description 32.5 to >29.25 pts Exemplary Developed an outline that clearly describes the main points (causes of the problem, effects, and potential solution) along with the supporting points (benefits and risks), as well as how the evidence identified supports the main and supporting points. 29.25 to >26 pts Competent Developed an outline that includes relevant main and supporting points, but two or three points lack evidence. 26 to >22.75 pts Satisfactory Developed an outline that includes main and supporting points. Evidence is used in the outline, but its appropriateness and relevance to the points is unclear. 22.75 to >19.5 pts Needs Improvement Developed an outline that includes main and supporting points. The main and supporting points may not be clear or may lack evidence. 19.5 to >0 pts Unacceptable Did not develop an outline that includes main points. / 32.5 pts Create an introduction beginning with a hook (1–2 sentences) that clearly supports the thesis statement, concise background information on the topic (2-3 sentences), and a clear, one-sentence thesis statement. view longer description 26 to >23.4 pts Exemplary Created an introduction that includes a hook (1–2 sentences) that clearly supports the thesis statement, concise background information on the topic (two sentences), and a clear thesis statement (one sentence). 23.4 to >20.8 pts Competent Created an introduction beginning with a hook (1–2 sentences), background information (2-3 sentences), and a clear, one-sentence thesis statement, BUT either the hook does not clearly support the thesis statement, OR the background information is only slightly related to the topic. 20.8 to >18.2 pts Satisfactory Created an introduction that includes either a hook that supports the thesis statement, OR background information on the topic, AND a clear thesis statement (one sentence). 18.2 to >15.6 pts Needs Improvement Created an introduction that includes only one of the following: a hook that supports the thesis statement, background information on the topic, OR a thesis statement. 15.6 to >0 pts Unacceptable The introduction is missing, or there is no hook, background, or clear thesis statement. / 26 pts Create a 5-6 sentence conclusion paragraph that fully restates the thesis in new words, summarizes the solution, and includes a specific, practical call to action. view longer description 19.5 to >17.55 pts Exemplary Created a 5-6 sentence conclusion paragraph that fully restates the thesis in new words, summarizes the solution, and includes a specific, practical call to action. 17.55 to >15.6 pts Competent Created a 5-sentence conclusion paragraph that fully reiterates the thesis statement, without restating in new words, summarizes the solution, and includes a specific, practical call to action. 15.6 to >13.65 pts Satisfactory Created a conclusion paragraph of less than 5 sentences that partially restates the thesis OR partially restates the solution. It includes a specific, practical call to action. 13.65 to >11.7 pts Needs Improvement Created a conclusion paragraph that does not restate the thesis, OR does not summarize the solution OR includes an impractical call to action. 11.7 to >0 pts Unacceptable Did not create a conclusion that restates the thesis statement, and summarizes the main points of the proposal, and contains a practical call to action. / 19.5 pts Explain how one or more audience appeals were used to guide the creation of one specific supporting point and one specific piece of evidence. view longer description 19.5 to >17.55 pts Exemplary Explained how one or more audience appeals were used to guide the creation of one specific supporting point AND one specific piece of evidence. Used the consideration of appeals to describe the characteristics or values of the audience. 17.55 to >15.6 pts Competent Explained how one or more audience appeals were used to guide the creation of one specific supporting point AND one specific piece of evidence. Did not use the consideration of appeals to describe the characteristics or values of the audience. 15.6 to >13.65 pts Satisfactory Explained how one or more audience appeals were used to guide the creation of one specific supporting point OR one specific piece of evidence. 13.65 to >11.7 pts Needs Improvement Explained how one or more audience appeals were used to guide the creation of supporting points and/or evidence in general terms. 11.7 to >0 pts Unacceptable Did not describe the audience for the outline and the evidence and appeals used. / 19.5 pts Reflect on how feedback was incorporated into your outline by concisely summarizing relevant feedback in your own words, describing specific changes made based on this feedback, and explaining how these changes improved the quality of work. view longer description 19.5 to >17.55 pts Exemplary Reflected on how feedback was incorporated into your outline by concisely summarizing relevant feedback in your own words, describing specific changes made based on this feedback, and explaining how these changes improved the quality of work. 17.55 to >15.6 pts Competent Reflected on how feedback was incorporated into your outline by summarizing relevant feedback and describing specific changes made based on this feedback. 15.6 to >13.65 pts Satisfactory Reflected on how feedback was incorporated into your outline by summarizing relevant feedback and describing general changes based on this feedback. 13.65 to >11.7 pts Needs Improvement Reflected on how feedback was incorporated into your outline by summarizing relevant feedback. 11.7 to >0 pts Unacceptable Did not describe feedback received on earlier work. / 19.5 pts Produce writing that is clear and well organized and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling. view longer description 13 to >11.7 pts Exemplary Produced writing that is clear and well organized and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Errors are minimal (0–3). 11.7 to >10.4 pts Competent Produced writing that is clear and well organized and applies appropriate SWS style. Writing contains accurate grammar, mechanics, and spelling. There may be minor errors (4–5), but they do not impact the ability of the reader to understand the writing. 10.4 to >9.1 pts Satisfactory Produced writing that attempts to be clear and well organized and to apply appropriate SWS style. Writing contains some errors in grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Overall, errors are moderate (6–7) and have some impact on the ability of the reader to understand the writing. 9.1 to >7.8 pts Needs Improvement Produced writing that has noticeable issues with clarity, organization, and the application of SWS style. Errors in grammar, mechanics, and spelling detract from readability. Overall, errors are major (8–9) and have definite impact on the ability of the reader to understand the writing. 7.8 to >0 pts Unacceptable Produced writing that lacks clarity, organization, or does not apply SWS style. There are significant issues with grammar, mechanics, and spelling. Overall, errors are significant (10 or more), and the reader will have difficulty understanding the writing. / 13 pts
