Read: M1_Discussion_Research Ethics.pdf
This compilation of short readings includes: a blog posted on Education Week, an earlier New York Times opinion article, two Twitter threads, and another opinion article from University Affairs. (Make sure you’ve also reviewed the chapter and the Power Point lesson on research ethics.) Although the main example in the reading comes from higher education, think about these issues in relation to your own field.
Some questions to think about to inform your reflection:
When should something “count” as research in your field, such that IRB approval should be required?
What should we do when research ethics collide with other ethical systems (e.g., corporations that have ethical obligations to their shareholders; doctors’ to patients; etc.) or individual moral beliefs? In what areas is this most likely to occur in your field?
How does digital technology impact research ethics? How should it?
Step #2: Reply To Your Peers
After you have submitted your post, please reply to the posts of at least two (2) of your peers. In those replies, do not just say “I agree” or “I disagree.” You need to actively (deeply) engage with what they wrote. For example, you could talk about:
how what they wrote is related to your own life/experiences
how what they wrote is not related to your own life/experiences
expand on what they wrote and/or provide additional suggestions
explain why you agree and/or disagree with what they described
(Note: You will not be able to see other students’ posts until you have submitted your own.)
Initial posts are due Friday at 11:59 PM.
Replies are due Sunday at 08:00 AM.
***Click on the three vertical dots above the due date in the top right corner to see the grading rubric.
