Part 1: Professional Correspondence portfolio- Click herefor the prompt. Reply to this thread and attach a copy of your Professional Correspondence Portfolio draft.
Part 2: Peer Review Pick two Professional Correspondence Portfolio drafts to review.
Try to choose drafts that have fewer reviews.
Answer the following questions in response to each writer’s discussion post.
Professional: Does the portfolio have all of the necessary parts?
Is the portfolio grammatically correct?
Do the individual parts match or mimic the format of the textbook samples?
Clear and Concise: Does the writer use clear and concise sentences throughout the portfolio?
Are there parts that are confusing, distracting, or harder to understand?
Evidence-driven and Persuasive: Does the writer use three techniques to extend the definition in the definition project?
Does the writer use evidence from Indeed.com/Glassdoor.com, the Occupational Outlook Handbook, and the company website to back up his/her claims in the email?
Does the writer use concrete evidence from his/her past experience in his/her resume and cover letter?
Did he/she maintain a professional and credible tone throughout the cover letter?
Does the writer seem like a good potential candidate for the job opening?
Overall: What did you like about the portfolio? What are some potential areas for improvement?
