The question for the discussion is “Should unreasonable search and seizure ever be justified as a form of criminal investigation, if that would reduce crime rates? What would Immanuel Kant, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill say about it? What’s your opinion?”
The answer this question you have my course material such as lectures, textbooks and outside sources to make an argument.
Discussion assignment: The purpose of these discussions is to familiarize you with the themes and concepts presented by the authors. The discussion post should be at least fifteen sentences, two or three well-developed paragraphs.
Rubric:
Evaluation Criteria (4×15):
-Clarity: Is the material placed in a framework that helps me and the other students understand the arguments of the authors? (x5)
-Creativity: Are the examples and ideas recent and relevant? (x5)
-Correctness: How well did you understand the concepts and themes? Did you include the most important elements? (x5)
Citations and references are expected to be handled accurately.
Any official referencing style is acceptable if it is recognized and applied consistently.
This discussion is worth 20% of my total grade in the course.
So please do your best!
textbook guide for the assignment:
– Sandel, M. J. (2009). Justice: What’s the
right thing to do? New York: Farrar, Straus
and Giroux. Chapter 5, pp. 103- 139
-Sandel, M. J. (2009). Justice: What’s the
right thing to do? New York: Farrar, Straus
and Giroux. Chapter 2, pp. 31- 57
https://iasbaba.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Michael_Sandel-_Justice-_What_s_the_Right_Thing_to_Do.pdf
