Write an in-depth analysis of one of the following essays in Unit 2. Use MLA format. For your rough draft, try to write about 2 pages. Final draft is 2-3 pages!
As we discussed in class, come up with a clear thesis statement, underline or highlight it, and place it in your first P, preferably the last sentence. If not, reiterate it in your final sentence.
Make each P support your thesis or state a counterargument. Write fully supported paragraphs that flow, and work on discussing several quotes that illustrate your argument. Remember, acknowledging a counterargument makes your case stronger.
For example, you can acknowledge that all humans smile socially, however agree with Cunningham that women are expected by society to be the “kinder,” “gentler,” “happier” sex, to their detriment. Or, as we discussed, you might argue that Cunningham is wrong. Smiling is not a gender issue, and men and women, girls and boys, are asked to hide their feelings whether by smiling inauthentically or by asking us not to cry or show our feelings.
In a response to Nora Ephrons 1975 article, you might argue that graphic photojournalism is triggering and should not be seen or published. Or, you might argue that graphic photos and videos should be seen and talked about, like Ephron concludes, to orchestrate change in society, to make us discuss difficult issues. (Think about recordings of crimes or police misuse of power, or videos of violence, terrorism, or war.)
Make your essay your own by coming up with your original discussion of the story, not someone else’s view. I’m only interested in your ideas, not some random critics’ ideas of the narrative.
