In Hoagland, the defendant wanted to assert a necessity defense to the crime of driving while under the influence.

Words: 128
Pages: 1
Subject: Uncategorized

Read Hoagland v. State, 240 P.3d 1043 (2010) available at Hoagland v State

In Hoagland, the defendant wanted to assert a necessity defense to the crime of driving while under the influence. The Nevada Legislature had never addressed or mentioned a necessity defense. Do you agree with the Court’s ruling in this case? Why, or not?

Let Us write for you! We offer custom paper writing services Order Now.

REVIEWS


Criminology Order #: 564575

“ This is exactly what I needed . Thank you so much.”

Joanna David.


Communications and Media Order #: 564566
"Great job, completed quicker than expected. Thank you very much!"

Peggy Smith.

Art Order #: 563708
Thanks a million to the great team.

Harrison James.


"Very efficient definitely recommend this site for help getting your assignments to help"

Hannah Seven