Critically evaluate Robert Nozick’s version of libertarianism: (i) explain what you take to be the key features of
Nozick’s view, (ii) consider what you take to be the most interesting and/or effective criticism of libertarianism, and
(iii) imagine what Nozick’s response would be to the criticism you consider. Make sure that it is clear whether you
think Nozick can handle the objection you consider, since this will become part of the main thesis of the paper: are
you ultimately saying that Nozick’s theory is a good one, or not? [remember, the paper is not about libertarianism
in general, nor is it about somebody else’s version; it’s about Nozick’s libertarianism, as he argues for it in our class
reading specifically]
