Argumentative paper. After watching Finding Forrester, please decide whether you think Jamal Wallace is innocent or guilty of plagiarizing, prove your opinion. There should be evidence of logos, ethos, and pathos in explaining your point of view.

Please adhere to the guidelines listed below:
Please use the MLA heading that we discussed in class.
You must have an introduction, at least 3 body paragraphs, and a conclusion. (Remember, each of your body paragraphs must be centered on one idea and have at least 3 main points and 3 supporting details).
Please make sure to use quotes and specific examples from the movie in each of your body paragraphs. The link to the script is copied here for you: http://www.script-o-rama.com/movie_scripts/f/finding-forrester-script-transcript.html
(Links to an external site.)
There should be evidence of logos, ethos, and pathos in explaining your point of view. We all agree that using a combination of these methods is most effective in persuasion. What logical arguments could be used in this case? What emotional appeals are present? Do we find the characters to be ethical? Why?
Please keep in mind this is an argumentative paper. There should be very little summary of the movie (any summary should be placed in the introduction only). The main purpose of the argumentative paper is to make a claim and then support it.