There requirements was Part one: critically consider and evaluate the role and value of the performance assessment approach (500 words) • This is an academic section of what we going to be writing about in Part 2(for example business plans. budgeting, balance scorecard.). where it should will be purely explaining about what financial ratios are. This must be a balanced reflection and must consider connecting it to the organization (expo2020dubai). it must be purely using academic references • would write about the theory, a balanced critical reflection of the theory of whichever one we are going to be using in part 2 (theories and referencing) • Part one critically evaluates the role and value of the performance assessment approach of what you’re going to be writing about in Part 2. Part two: incorporating available information, investigate a significant aspect of the recent performance (e.g. investment, management or financial) of an organization of your choice – private or public sector, profit seeking or not-for-profit and clearly state and justify (from your chosen evaluation standpoint for instance; a shareholder, analyst, employee or manager) the likely consequences of its assessed performance on your future actions (2,500 words max) • Part 2 would investigate a significant aspect: recent performance and justify it from your chosen evaluation standpoint of Expo2020dubai. it should direct report to a specific stakeholder. • Based on that stakeholder, there must be an objective of the report being the likely consequence of the assessed performance (Assess what is important to those stakeholders and drive some objectives from it, for example, whether the financial health of the business is an It’s adequate whether they are risky in a way. If you were doing the investors, and then do so financial analysis so your significant financial analysis is linked to the objective) it must be very specific. and making recommendations and advice to the target audience based on the objectives The assessment did not meet the requirement due to the below feedback as well as the comments 2 What you could improve? Unfortunately, the report didn’t answer the assignment brief. Although it noted that it would analyse the business plan and CSR there was not analysis of performance on these. To analyse a business plan it would need to compare forecast with actuals, to analyse CSR there would need to be a comparison again a competitor or if you were going to analyse performance using financial ratios you would calculate these on the financials and compare the results appropriately. To improve upon this assignment the performance assessment method needs to be decided, the objective made more specific and achievable and the perspective made clear. Comment #1 The introduction used a lot of the word count and didn’t obtain any marks, to improve try to write more concisely in introductions in include more detail in the main sections. Please also read the in-text comments additional to this summary and review the assessment criteria rubric in connection with the indicative grades 1. In section 3 “The Role of the Performance Assessment Approach” – What is the performance assessment approach you are using, it is unclear up to this point? – These are correct however this section was an academic section describing which one of these you chose to apply in part 2 and needs more focus on this – A business plan has a finance section, however this is more about projections and forecasts with less focus on financial ratios. – Understanding a company’s impact on a country is too complex for this report to assess. To improve this objective could be simplified and more focused. In section 5 “Financial Performance “ – These are all statements and are opinion. This is very descriptive and doesn’t critically analyse performance – This doesn’t answer the assignment brief. The objective listed was to analyse a business plan however this isn’t clear in this section and it’s unclear who the target audience is for this report?
