1. What is something you learned from the Jobling and Gill article? Be specific.
2. Jobling and Gill state “as powerful as DNA analysis is, it is far from being the sine qua non of forensic casework”, what do they mean by this? And what is their reasoning behind making this statement? Be specific, and be sure to answer both questions here. I expect you to synthesize information from the entire article to answer this question.
Citation:
Jobling MA, Gill P. Encoded Evidence: DNA in Forensic Analysis. Nature Reviews: Genetics 2004;5:739-752. doi:10.1038/nrg1455
