Is the policy problem clearly defined, well-supported by evidence, and presented in a compelling way for the intended audience?
Has the author defined clear criteria by which s/he will evaluate possible policy alternatives that are grounded in relevant evidence and values? Has the author laid out a fair set of policy alternatives and evaluated those alternatives based on the criteria s/he has previously defined?
Has the author clearly chosen a preferred policy and defended that choice based on his/her defined criteria?
Has the author conducted a convincing stakeholder analysis and presented a clear strategy for assembling a political coalition in support of his/her preferred policy? Has the author applied at least two policy tools covered in the class to their analysis? Are these concepts applied clearly and compelling and based on outside research?
-Would be appreciated if you could use Cost-Benefit Analysis and Nation-Wide Survey as two policy tools to evaluate the solutions-
