The year is 2050 and we now have the ability to safely use gene-editing techniques to modify embryos. Should we seek to curb or ban use of the new genetic interventions for personal taste (e,g. blue-eyed babies, athletic ability, superior intelligence)? What moral arguments are the most relevant? Rely on ethical principles and concepts in your essay and refer to the assigned reading as much as possible. Insert an analysis that explores Kantian and/or utilitarian perspectives. Discuss the pros and cons of your strongest arguments. Note that the technology is already safe to use.
As explained below, you should have a total of 10 references. Every different chapter in the Vaughn text counts as a new reference.
“Bioethics: Principles, Issues, and Cases” By Lewis Vaughn is the assigned textbook. 4th Edition
Additional guidance:
Question topic is clear and succinct. The introduction is well written and outlines students arguments.
The student identifies the key ethical dilemmas presented by the question. What are the potential paths/responses to the ethical dilemmas?
Throughout the paper, relevant ethical principles and concepts are discussed and fully explained.
Student provides a thoughtful and comprehensive analysis of alternative arguments and identifies key arguments made in the assigned reading.
Student provides a concluding opinion that references relevant literature and includes students assessment of the literature.
Students makes clear word choices and uses proper grammar. Words are not misspelled.
Student uses topic sentences and clear and concise language in each paragraph.
Student provides at least 10 references to peer reviewed literature or law review articles published by law journals. You may add additional news sources, but only the Atlantic, NY Times, Wall Street Journal, or
