Horowitz, M. & Scharre, P. (2015) The morality of robotic war. The New York Times. The paper should provide a thoughtful critique of an argument presented in one or more of the required readings The paper should not merely summarize the reading but should make a well-reasoned and well-supported argument. Students are strongly encouraged to draw on their knowledge of real-word cases/evidence or outside reading to support their critique, which may be favorable or unfavorable, of a point made in the required reading. you need to support your points with some evidence or an example. Every argument you make in support of the author needs to be supported – otherwise, you are asking the reader to take you at your word and it’s not convincing. I believe you and agree with your argument, but you need to think about a skeptical reader. Try and frame the paper too around your own argument without it feeling like a review
