What is your inclusive argument for or against the thesis you are discussing, about man’s ethical relation to nature?

Words: 204
Pages: 1
Subject: Uncategorized

Here you are invited to discuss the essay by Ralston on “Environmental Ethics” or one of the very well known “Worldview” perspectives on environmental ethics, esp. the famous “Land Ethic” by Leopold or the “Deep Ecology” theory of Naess. What is the critical theory or claim that you would like to address, and the argument for it? What are the points pro and con that can be made in relation to the argument? What is your inclusive argument for or against the thesis you are discussing, about man’s ethical relation to nature? Do we have an ethical relation to nature – or is the basic ethical question essentially prudential, i.e. how should humans relate to the natural environment as a resource, so as to maximize and not harm human well-being?

Let Us write for you! We offer custom paper writing services Order Now.

REVIEWS


Criminology Order #: 564575

“ This is exactly what I needed . Thank you so much.”

Joanna David.


Communications and Media Order #: 564566
"Great job, completed quicker than expected. Thank you very much!"

Peggy Smith.

Art Order #: 563708
Thanks a million to the great team.

Harrison James.


"Very efficient definitely recommend this site for help getting your assignments to help"

Hannah Seven