This assignment has two sections: Task: You need to view the Family Connect video, both part 1 and part 2. observing the membership, structure, purpose, dynamics, stages and processes of the group and any other information you have gleaned from your reading. Video 1 – I will upload the video Video 2 – I will upload the video Part A (1000 words) Critically analyse this group in terms of its intended purpose, structure, membership, group dynamics and stages. Use examples from your observations of the group to support your answers using contemporary (in last 10 years), peer reviewed literature (not blogs, websites or magazine pieces) . Part B: (2000 words + conclusion) (i) Provide a critical analysis in relation to the facilitation style demonstrated by the two co-facilitators of this group. As part of your critical reflection, include any ethical issues/challenges/conflicts that emerged or remained unspoken. Did the facilitators address these issues effectively? Additionally what further considerations would need to be taken into account for the next few sessions if the same facilitators and participants were to continue in the group? (1500 words) (ii) On reflection, if you had been the facilitator of this group, how similar or different would your approach have been to that taken by the facilitators, and why? (500 words). Write a Reflection upon facilitators style of leadership including ethical issues/challenges/conflicts; what you would have done differently; and the similarities/differences between their approach and the one you would have taken (and why). Remember to use relevant literature to support your argument in both Part A and B. You may find modules 1, 2 and 3 in your unit guide of particular use in the completion of this assignment, however please use a broader literature review in order to provide an analysis of sufficient depth. Please use the marking criteria to help structure your assignment.Show more
