How does Terpstra propose that we re-evaluate the beginning of the Reformation? Why does he suggest this? 2) How might such a re-evaluation of the beginning and nature of the Reformation affect how historians view it? Another way of asking the same question: if we view the Reformation as Terpstra invites us to, instead of as a fight over theology and doctrine, what sort of new questions might this prompt historians to ask and research? In the title and body of the essay, Terpstra refers to an influential book, Benedict Anderson′s Imagined Communities. Here is a link to a brief desсrіption of Anderson′s argument, which Terpstra builds on. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v＝NbJ85UMTn_4&feature＝youtu.be Formatting Papers should be double-spaced, with 1” margins, and 12-pt Times New Roman font. Put your name and the title of the paper at the top of the first page; no other heading is necessary.
