Please look at the rubric!!!!!!!!!!!! For the strategic choice that you recommended, prepare a Memorandum to Elon Musk addressing each of the questions below, and post it to Blackboard. No passive voice Q1 (30 points) – Which existing GH organizations could become top choices for catalytic partnership in each of the strategic areas identified? You must choose no fewer than 3 GH organisations and need to be as specific and precise as possible (e.g., imprecise, generic examples such as the private sector or civil society will NOT be accepted). Note that in your Nov. 17 meeting, Musk said that In principle, I dont want 1) to spend money on media campaigns, nor 2) duplicate the work that others are doing. But I believe in the power of global knowledge networks to make my investments truly catalytic. In addressing the above questions, the philanthropist is looking for the following signs of high-quality advice: 1) You have analyzed the global health landscape 2) You have assessed the pros and cons of existing GH organizations 3) You have recommended a minimum of three GH organizations 4) You have summarized the strengths and limitations of each proposed partner in your strategic area of choice. Q2 -30 points- Musk wants to create a global network for preparedness and response to global health emergencies. He wants to know 1) whether you recommend the launch of such partnership in the form of a new GH network and 2) why. In addressing these questions, the philanthropist is looking for the following signs of high-quality advice: 1) Your analysis demonstrates consideration of existing networks of GH actors. 2) Your recommendations are based on existing evidence about the effectiveness of GH partnerships and networks; and 3) The rationale for your recommendation is explained with clarity and precision. Q3- 30 points- Based on the guiding philanthropic principles listed above, Musk wants to ensure that all future grants made by this new foundation are targeted on the production of measurable results. He asks that in your memo you address the following questions: 1) How do you recommend that the new foundation applies the evidence generated by the OECD from their evaluation of results-based approaches to official development assistance? 2) How would the philanthropist know that his foundation has been successful in this aspect? 3) What types of evidence would you use to evaluate the effectiveness of results-based grant-making? In addressing these questions, the philanthropist is looking for the following signs of high-quality advice: The quality of the evidence that you used in framing the effectiveness of results-based approaches
