. 1. A brief introduction to the concept, including some discussion as to its relevance to the students practice interest. 2. Some discussion as to the rationale for why the two publications authors sought to investigate the particular concept. 3. Compare and contrast the processes/procedures used in both analyses. Make certain to briefly describe the analysis method/model used in each of the analyses and do this in your own words. Do NOT submit lengthy quotes, verbatim content, etc. The hard work of the assignment is your hard work and as such, you are required to summarize, synthesize, annotate, and distill key ideas and concerns. 4. Create a succinct, clear summary of the analyses offered by each analysis. 5. Critique the quality of each analysis; compare and contrast their strengths and opportunities for improvement. Make certain that your critiques are reasonable. Use both analyses to assist you in evaluating the pairthey should offer you a chance to balance your critique through the comparison and contrast. 6. Offer concluding commentary about what you learned as a result of this assignment. What surprised you? What intrigued you? What was difficult for you? Balanced critique and thoughtfulness are required. How might this new learning may influence your view of this concept and its relevance to your practice specialty/patterns of care.Show more
