Using a two-step process evaluate and synthesize the external evidence results from two (2) of the strongest external studies retrieved during the search of the literature that supports the intervention of the PICOT question. These are the studies that answer the chosen PICOT question and directly relate to the chosen intervention. The studies must be within the discipline of nursing and not medicine. Assignment
Criteria: Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria: Complete the Evaluation Table Template with the results from the two strongest external evidence studies. Pages 119-145 (5th edition) provides detailed samples of what type of information should be included in each category of the Evaluation Table.
Also, Section 6.1, Pages 256-258 of the text, provides a detailed narrative of what information needs to be included in each category of the Evaluation Table. Determine the strength of each of the two (2) studies using the rating system in Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (5th edition) page 21 and add the Level for each study to the evaluation table. The information on the evaluation table should be in bulleted format, not sentences.
Include a legend on the evaluation table. Place the completed Evaluation Table as an appendix. Write a one-page narrative that analyzes how the evidence from the two studies supports the intervention of the PICOT question. If the evidence does not support the intervention, describe what would be the next step in the evidence-based practice process. Include a brief introduction, purpose statement and conclusion. Level 1 headings required. Include a title page, reference page and appendix. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner.
