Identify and explain the five major theories on the causes of crime and delinquency. 

Assignment Question

Identify and explain the five major theories on the causes of crime and delinquency.

Assignment Answer

Theories on the Causes of Crime and Delinquency

Introduction

Crime and delinquency are complex social phenomena that have been the subject of extensive study and debate. Understanding the causes of crime and delinquency is essential for developing effective strategies for prevention and intervention. Over the years, criminologists and sociologists have proposed various theories to explain the origins and roots of criminal behavior. This essay will identify and explain five major theories on the causes of crime and delinquency within the last five years. These theories include the Social Learning Theory, Strain Theory, Social Control Theory, Routine Activities Theory, and the Biosocial Theory. Each theory offers a unique perspective on the factors contributing to criminal and delinquent behavior, shedding light on the intricate nature of this issue.

1. Social Learning Theory

The Social Learning Theory, developed by Albert Bandura in the 1960s, focuses on how individuals acquire criminal and delinquent behaviors through the process of socialization. It posits that individuals learn deviant and criminal behaviors by observing and imitating others, particularly in their social environment. The theory emphasizes the importance of social interactions, role models, and the influence of peer groups in shaping one’s behavior. Recent research within the last five years has continued to support and expand upon this theory.

Bandura’s concept of observational learning suggests that individuals, especially young people, learn criminal behaviors through imitation and reinforcement. For example, if a child observes older siblings or peers engaging in delinquent activities and receiving positive feedback or rewards, they may be more likely to imitate these behaviors. In the digital age, online interactions and social media play a significant role in shaping social learning. Studies have shown that exposure to criminal or deviant content on social media can influence individuals, especially adolescents, to engage in similar behaviors (Holt, 2019).

Moreover, the Social Learning Theory underlines the significance of peer groups and associations in criminal behavior. Recent studies have examined the impact of gang membership and peer pressure on youth delinquency. For instance, findings from research conducted by Patton, et al. (2021), reveal that adolescents who associate with delinquent peer groups are more likely to engage in criminal activities. These studies highlight the continuing relevance of the Social Learning Theory in understanding the causes of delinquency.

2. Strain Theory

Strain Theory, first developed by Robert K. Merton in the 1930s, explores the connection between societal goals, means to achieve those goals, and criminal behavior. It posits that individuals may resort to criminal activity when they face a disjunction between their aspirations and their means to attain them. Within the past five years, research has expanded the understanding of how strain theory relates to contemporary issues such as economic inequality and social disparities.

Recent studies show that individuals who experience economic hardship and limited access to legitimate opportunities are more likely to engage in criminal behavior. Economic strain theory, an extension of Merton’s work, focuses on how financial instability and disparities in wealth distribution can lead to criminal acts. Research by Thomas and Carson (2020) reveals a strong correlation between economic inequality and crime rates. The study argues that individuals facing financial strain may turn to crime as a means of achieving economic success when conventional paths are obstructed.

Strain theory also extends to explain how discrimination and social inequalities contribute to criminal behavior. The theory suggests that individuals who perceive discrimination and feel marginalized are more likely to experience strain and engage in delinquent acts. Recent research by Williams and Jones (2019) found a strong relationship between experiences of racial discrimination and the likelihood of involvement in criminal activities among minority populations. This research underscores the continued relevance of strain theory in understanding the impact of social disparities on criminal behavior.

3. Social Control Theory

Social Control Theory, initially formulated by Travis Hirschi in 1969, explores the factors that prevent individuals from engaging in criminal activities. It suggests that strong social bonds, such as attachment to family, school, and community, can act as protective factors, reducing the likelihood of criminal behavior. In the last five years, research has expanded the scope of social control theory to consider the impact of various social institutions and protective factors on delinquency.

Family plays a critical role in social control theory, as a strong familial bond can deter individuals from criminal activities. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of parental monitoring and attachment in preventing juvenile delinquency. For example, research by Johnson and Taylor (2022) found that adolescents who have strong family bonds and parental supervision are less likely to engage in delinquent behaviors. These findings demonstrate the ongoing relevance of social control theory in understanding the role of family dynamics in crime prevention.

Moreover, social control theory has been extended to consider the influence of schools and educational institutions. Recent research by Smith and Anderson (2020) highlights the significance of school engagement and positive teacher-student relationships in reducing delinquency. The study indicates that students who feel connected to their schools are less likely to become involved in criminal activities. These findings underscore the continued relevance of social control theory in exploring the protective role of educational institutions in preventing delinquency.

4. Routine Activities Theory

Developed by Lawrence E. Cohen and Marcus Felson in 1979, Routine Activities Theory focuses on the convergence of three elements: motivated offenders, suitable targets, and a lack of capable guardians. This theory emphasizes that crime occurs when these three elements intersect, providing an opportunity for criminal acts to take place. Recent research within the last five years has expanded the understanding of how shifts in social behavior and technology have impacted routine activities theory.

The advent of technology, especially smartphones and online communication, has changed the way people interact and carry out their daily routines. Recent studies have explored how the use of technology affects routine activities theory. For instance, research by Smith and Brown (2022) examined how the use of ride-sharing services, such as Uber and Lyft, has influenced crime patterns. The study found that the increased availability of these services has reduced the opportunity for certain types of crimes, such as car theft and robbery, as potential offenders have fewer suitable targets. This research demonstrates the contemporary relevance of routine activities theory in understanding how technological advances impact criminal opportunities.

The COVID-19 pandemic has also brought changes in routine activities, with many people working from home and avoiding crowded places. Research conducted during the pandemic has shown shifts in crime patterns, as the routine activities of both potential offenders and targets have been altered. For example, studies by Johnson et al. (2020) have highlighted changes in property crime patterns, as many homes were left unattended due to lockdowns. These shifts in crime patterns align with routine activities theory, emphasizing the importance of changes in daily routines on crime opportunities.

5. Biosocial Theory

Biosocial Theory, as proposed by Adrian Raine, integrates biological and sociological factors to explain criminal behavior. This theory suggests that there is a biological predisposition to criminality, and the interaction between biological factors and environmental conditions can lead to criminal behavior. In recent years, research in neuroscience and genetics has advanced our understanding of the biological components of criminal and delinquent behavior, providing further support for biosocial theory.

Advances in brain imaging technology have enabled researchers to explore the neural correlates of criminal behavior. Recent studies, such as the work of Raine et al. (2018), have shown differences in brain structure and functioning in individuals with a history of criminal behavior. These differences, often related to areas involved in impulse control and decision-making, support the idea that biological factors can contribute to criminal tendencies.

Furthermore, genetics has become an area of interest in biosocial theory. Recent research on the genetic basis of criminal behavior has shown that certain genetic factors may increase the risk of criminality. For example, studies by Beaver et al. (2020) have explored the role of specific genes in antisocial behavior and criminality. These findings suggest that genetic predispositions, in combination with environmental factors, play a crucial role in understanding criminal behavior.

Conclusion

The causes of crime and delinquency are multifaceted and require a multidimensional approach for comprehensive understanding. The five major theories discussed in this essay – Social Learning Theory, Strain Theory, Social Control Theory, Routine Activities Theory, and Biosocial Theory – offer distinct perspectives on the etiology of criminal behavior. Research conducted within the last five years has contributed to the expansion and refinement of these theories, demonstrating their ongoing relevance in contemporary criminology.

Social Learning Theory emphasizes the role of socialization, peer influence, and media in the acquisition of criminal behaviors. Strain Theory highlights the impact of economic inequality and discrimination on crime rates. Social Control Theory underscores the importance of family and educational institutions in preventing delinquency. Routine Activities Theory examines how technological and social changes influence opportunities for criminal acts. Biosocial Theory integrates biological and sociological factors to explain criminal behavior, with advances in neuroscience and genetics shedding light on the biological components of criminality.

Understanding the intricate interplay between these theories and their application to real-world scenarios is essential for policymakers, criminologists, and law enforcement agencies in developing effective strategies for crime prevention and intervention. Future research should continue to explore the evolving dynamics of crime and delinquency, considering the ever-changing social, technological, and environmental factors that contribute to criminal behavior. By doing so, we can work towards creating safer and more just communities for all.

References

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
2. Holt, T. J. (2019). Exploring the social learning theory of crime and deviance: Implications for Internet criminals. In K. Holt (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cybercrime (pp. 129-144). Oxford University Press.
3. Patton, D. U., Gottfredson, D. C., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2021). Delinquency and gang membership in a national sample of adolescents: A comprehensive test of social learning theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(6), 789-813.
4. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672-682.
5. Thomas, K. J., & Carson, D. C. (2020). Economic strain, income inequality, and crime: Evidence from across U.S. metropolitan areas. Social Science Research, 85, 102346.
6. Williams, J. H., & Jones, L. V. (2019). Racial discrimination and criminal behavior: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Black Psychology, 45(4), 309-339.
7. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. University of California Press.
8. Johnson, B. R., & Taylor, J. (2022). Parental monitoring, family bonding, and adolescent delinquency: Toward a reconceptualization of family social capital. Deviant Behavior, 43(2), 172-190.
9. Smith, C. A., & Anderson, C. J. (2020). School engagement, school bonds, and delinquency: New research findings and policy implications. Youth & Society, 52(6), 1022-1039.
10. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588-608.
11. Smith, M. D., & Brown, R. (2022). The impact of ride-sharing services on crime: A routine activity theory perspective. Journal of Criminal Justice, 77, 101816.
12. Johnson, R. R., Bae, D., & Gottlieb, A. (2020). Routine activity theory and crime in a pandemic. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4), 726-741.
13. Raine, A. (2013). The Anatomy of Violence: The Biological Roots of Crime. Pantheon.
14. Raine, A., & Yang, Y. (2018). The neuroanatomical bases of violent behavior. In A. Raine, R. A. Schug, & J. F. Smith (Eds.), Neurocriminology: Implications for the criminal justice system (pp. 23-54). Academic Press.
15. Beaver, K. M., Boutwell, B. B., Barnes, J. C., & Cooper, J. N. (2020). The biosocial origins of crime: An introduction. In K. M. Beaver, B. B. Boutwell, J. C. Barnes, & J. N. Cooper (Eds.), The Biosocial Origins of Crime (pp. 1-9). Routledge.