Which of these syllogisms is valid? Explain why these syllogisms are valid and which are not.

Words: 228
Pages: 1
Subject: Philosophy
Consider the following arguments
All chickens have feathers.
This animal has feathers.
Therefore, this animal is a chicken.

All chickens are green.
No green birds eat pickles.
Therefore, no chickens eat pickles.

All chickens are mortal.
My pet bird Gilda is a chicken.
Therefore, Gilda is mortal.

All chickens are birds.
All ducks are birds.
Therefore, all chickens are ducks.

Floyd is a rooster.
A rooster is a male chicken.
Therefore, Floyd is a chicken.

In a short (1 page) essay, explain the following:
Which of these syllogisms is valid? Explain why these syllogisms are valid and which are not. For the invalid syllogisms, include the reason(s) for the non-valid structure.
Which of these syllogisms is sound? Explain why these syllogisms are sound and which are not. For the unsound syllogisms, include the reason(s) for the unsound structure.
The discussion of the syllogisms should use proper grammar and formal language and use APA formatting.

Let Us write for you! We offer custom paper writing services Order Now.

REVIEWS


Criminology Order #: 564575

“ This is exactly what I needed . Thank you so much.”

Joanna David.


Communications and Media Order #: 564566
"Great job, completed quicker than expected. Thank you very much!"

Peggy Smith.

Art Order #: 563708
Thanks a million to the great team.

Harrison James.


"Very efficient definitely recommend this site for help getting your assignments to help"

Hannah Seven