An army surgeon performs an unnecessary operation on a battalion commander merely to remove him from battle because he lost too many men. How does this relate to a
consequentialist (utilitarian) approach to morality? Do you feel that in this case the end justifies the means? Is there ever a time when a good end justifies any means used to attain it? If so, when? If not, why?
consequentialist (utilitarian) approach to morality? Do you feel that in this case the end justifies the means? Is there ever a time when a good end justifies any means used to attain it? If so, when? If not, why?
-Reference Book
-2 additional scolarly sources
