(1). First, identifying the view that you will be defending and a contrary position that you will be critiquing, introduce your work and articulate your thesis clearly (Links to an external site.). Explain why the issue even matters. Do not assume that the reader understands your philosophical terminology.
(2). Next, build the case for the view with which you disagree, fairly and respectfully, and then (3) engage the argument critically. Apply the Principle of Charity (Links to an external site.) so as to avoid building straw men (Links to an external site.).
[Include one significant quote/citation for each side of the argument—using only strong sources. This demonstrates your ability to synthesize ideas and situate your own commentary with the Great Conversation. Cite your source properly and, if using a paranthetical style, include it in the bibliography.].
(4) Then, (following your critique of this view), present the position which you hold to be more reasonable, and defend it thoroughly and thoughtfully; convince the reader as to why yours is the stronger normative view.
(5) Demonstrate that you have thought well enough about the issue to expect your strongest naysayers. Present what you think are the strongest arguments against your position, and then offer a charitable but critical rebuttal.
[Include one significant quote/citation for each side of the argument—using only strong sources. This demonstrates your ability to synthesize ideas and situate your own commentary with the Great Conversation. Cite your source properly and, if using a paranthetical style, include it in the bibliography.].
Finally, choose from one of the situational dilemmas provided (these will become available in Module 0 at the end of week 7).
(6). Present and explain the dilemma (do not copy/paste my words, but paraphrase the dilemma into your own words).
(7). Then apply each theory to see what conclusions follow, and convince the reader as to why your normative theory provides the more reasonable reaction to the dilemma.
Defend your claims carefully; the instructor cares not for your opinions and/or feelings, but for the strength of your argument. Your work will be submitted online through an academic screening service to check for plagiarism.
(8). Bring closure to your essay (Links to an external site.). Hit your reader in the teeth, so to speak, with the point you have proved and why they should care (e.g. questions raised by or the implications of your research).
