Choose one of the two provided topics:
Right to Die
Video Games and Violent Behavior
For the “Right to Die” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “The Right to Die in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Can We Avoid the Slippery Slope Argument?” by Calabro, et al., from Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience (2016).
Read “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide are Unethical Acts” by Goligher, et al., from World Medical Journal (2019).
For the “Video Games and Violet Behavior” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “Violent Video Games and Violent Crimes,” by Cunningham, Engelstatter, and Ward, from Southern Economic Journal (2016).
Read “Violent Video Game Effects on Salivary Cortisol, Arousal, and Aggressive Thoughts in Children,” by Gentile, Bender, and Anderson, from Computers in Human Behavior (2017).
The articles provided for each topic argue opposite sides of the controversy. In 1,250-1,500 words:
Briefly analyze and compare the claims of both articles as well as the background of the controversy and how it became controversial. Include how historical perspectives and theories add to the controversy.
Examine the evidence given in the articles and explain which article creates a stronger argument. You are not choosing a side that supports your beliefs. Describe why one article’s argument is stronger than the other. Give examples from both. Include how current perspectives and theories support your rationale.
Identify any logical fallacies that exist in both and explain what makes them logic fallacies.
Describe how the controversy you chose is applicable and significant to the world.
Use at least four scholarly references to support your claims. Be sure to carefully review the rubric for specifics on selecting and integrating sources to effectively support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Choose one of the two provided topics:
Right to Die
Video Games and Violent Behavior
For the “Right to Die” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “The Right to Die in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Can We Avoid the Slippery Slope Argument?” by Calabro, et al., from Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience (2016).
Read “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide are Unethical Acts” by Goligher, et al., from World Medical Journal (2019).
For the “Video Games and Violet Behavior” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “Violent Video Games and Violent Crimes,” by Cunningham, Engelstatter, and Ward, from Southern Economic Journal (2016).
Read “Violent Video Game Effects on Salivary Cortisol, Arousal, and Aggressive Thoughts in Children,” by Gentile, Bender, and Anderson, from Computers in Human Behavior (2017).
The articles provided for each topic argue opposite sides of the controversy. In 1,250-1,500 words:
Briefly analyze and compare the claims of both articles as well as the background of the controversy and how it became controversial. Include how historical perspectives and theories add to the controversy.
Examine the evidence given in the articles and explain which article creates a stronger argument. You are not choosing a side that supports your beliefs. Describe why one article’s argument is stronger than the other. Give examples from both. Include how current perspectives and theories support your rationale.
Identify any logical fallacies that exist in both and explain what makes them logic fallacies.
Describe how the controversy you chose is applicable and significant to the world.
Use at least four scholarly references to support your claims. Be sure to carefully review the rubric for specifics on selecting and integrating sources to effectively support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Choose one of the two provided topics:
Right to Die
Video Games and Violent Behavior
For the “Right to Die” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “The Right to Die in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Can We Avoid the Slippery Slope Argument?” by Calabro, et al., from Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience (2016).
Read “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide are Unethical Acts” by Goligher, et al., from World Medical Journal (2019).
For the “Video Games and Violet Behavior” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “Violent Video Games and Violent Crimes,” by Cunningham, Engelstatter, and Ward, from Southern Economic Journal (2016).
Read “Violent Video Game Effects on Salivary Cortisol, Arousal, and Aggressive Thoughts in Children,” by Gentile, Bender, and Anderson, from Computers in Human Behavior (2017).
The articles provided for each topic argue opposite sides of the controversy. In 1,250-1,500 words:
Briefly analyze and compare the claims of both articles as well as the background of the controversy and how it became controversial. Include how historical perspectives and theories add to the controversy.
Examine the evidence given in the articles and explain which article creates a stronger argument. You are not choosing a side that supports your beliefs. Describe why one article’s argument is stronger than the other. Give examples from both. Include how current perspectives and theories support your rationale.
Identify any logical fallacies that exist in both and explain what makes them logic fallacies.
Describe how the controversy you chose is applicable and significant to the world.
Use at least four scholarly references to support your claims. Be sure to carefully review the rubric for specifics on selecting and integrating sources to effectively support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Choose one of the two provided topics:
Right to Die
Video Games and Violent Behavior
For the “Right to Die” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “The Right to Die in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Can We Avoid the Slippery Slope Argument?” by Calabro, et al., from Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience (2016).
Read “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide are Unethical Acts” by Goligher, et al., from World Medical Journal (2019).
For the “Video Games and Violet Behavior” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “Violent Video Games and Violent Crimes,” by Cunningham, Engelstatter, and Ward, from Southern Economic Journal (2016).
Read “Violent Video Game Effects on Salivary Cortisol, Arousal, and Aggressive Thoughts in Children,” by Gentile, Bender, and Anderson, from Computers in Human Behavior (2017).
The articles provided for each topic argue opposite sides of the controversy. In 1,250-1,500 words:
Briefly analyze and compare the claims of both articles as well as the background of the controversy and how it became controversial. Include how historical perspectives and theories add to the controversy.
Examine the evidence given in the articles and explain which article creates a stronger argument. You are not choosing a side that supports your beliefs. Describe why one article’s argument is stronger than the other. Give examples from both. Include how current perspectives and theories support your rationale.
Identify any logical fallacies that exist in both and explain what makes them logic fallacies.
Describe how the controversy you chose is applicable and significant to the world.
Use at least four scholarly references to support your claims. Be sure to carefully review the rubric for specifics on selecting and integrating sources to effectively support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Choose one of the two provided topics:
Right to Die
Video Games and Violent Behavior
For the “Right to Die” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “The Right to Die in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Can We Avoid the Slippery Slope Argument?” by Calabro, et al., from Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience (2016).
Read “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide are Unethical Acts” by Goligher, et al., from World Medical Journal (2019).
For the “Video Games and Violet Behavior” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “Violent Video Games and Violent Crimes,” by Cunningham, Engelstatter, and Ward, from Southern Economic Journal (2016).
Read “Violent Video Game Effects on Salivary Cortisol, Arousal, and Aggressive Thoughts in Children,” by Gentile, Bender, and Anderson, from Computers in Human Behavior (2017).
The articles provided for each topic argue opposite sides of the controversy. In 1,250-1,500 words:
Briefly analyze and compare the claims of both articles as well as the background of the controversy and how it became controversial. Include how historical perspectives and theories add to the controversy.
Examine the evidence given in the articles and explain which article creates a stronger argument. You are not choosing a side that supports your beliefs. Describe why one article’s argument is stronger than the other. Give examples from both. Include how current perspectives and theories support your rationale.
Identify any logical fallacies that exist in both and explain what makes them logic fallacies.
Describe how the controversy you chose is applicable and significant to the world.
Use at least four scholarly references to support your claims. Be sure to carefully review the rubric for specifics on selecting and integrating sources to effectively support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Choose one of the two provided topics:
Right to Die
Video Games and Violent Behavior
For the “Right to Die” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “The Right to Die in Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Can We Avoid the Slippery Slope Argument?” by Calabro, et al., from Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience (2016).
Read “Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide are Unethical Acts” by Goligher, et al., from World Medical Journal (2019).
For the “Video Games and Violet Behavior” topic, you will need the following content to complete this assignment:
Read “Violent Video Games and Violent Crimes,” by Cunningham, Engelstatter, and Ward, from Southern Economic Journal (2016).
Read “Violent Video Game Effects on Salivary Cortisol, Arousal, and Aggressive Thoughts in Children,” by Gentile, Bender, and Anderson, from Computers in Human Behavior (2017).
The articles provided for each topic argue opposite sides of the controversy. In 1,250-1,500 words:
Briefly analyze and compare the claims of both articles as well as the background of the controversy and how it became controversial. Include how historical perspectives and theories add to the controversy.
Examine the evidence given in the articles and explain which article creates a stronger argument. You are not choosing a side that supports your beliefs. Describe why one article’s argument is stronger than the other. Give examples from both. Include how current perspectives and theories support your rationale.
Identify any logical fallacies that exist in both and explain what makes them logic fallacies.
Describe how the controversy you chose is applicable and significant to the world.
Use at least four scholarly references to support your claims. Be sure to carefully review the rubric for specifics on selecting and integrating sources to effectively support your rationale.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Donna, create a title for your paper. When writing your paper try to compare and contrast two of the articles findings, provide some data and discuss the DSM-V
