the instruction and the material was attached, and for question 1 please reediting it.
MY ANSWER FOR QUESTION ONE:On the off chance that I were in the function of Susan Napoli, HR manager for the company, I will give following contentions to demonstrate my choice legitimate:
– According to the company rules, to find a new line of work in the company, a candidate needs to give his right subtleties on the application structure.
– Mr. Norbuck gave bogus insights regarding his schooling in the application structure, which isn’t right in the morals.
– If Mr. Norbuck gave us right subtleties he would not got chosen in the company.
– It is an extortion as indicated by the company.
– If we came to think about this at the hour of strike when no agreement was there, then we would fire him that time as well. On the off chance that we did as such, then this would be legitimate.
– But we come to know after the recharging of the agreement, yet misrepresentation is eventually extortion so dismissal of Mr. Norbuck ought to be legitimate.
