nThe second paper I’m asking you to complete is an “evaluative response paper” (or, in short, an “evaluation paper”). I’m asking you to read and respond to one of the sources below by writing a 3 to 4 page paper that evaluates the academic legitimacy of the paper. I’m asking you to engage in the “scholarly conversation” of a specific issue.
To be clear, these articles deal with the intersection of politics, media, and religion. These issues are very “hot-button” issues, so part of your success in this paper will be how well you look beyond your own beliefs, perceptions, and disagreements and identify and respond to a specific issue in one of the papers.
In this paper, you will be looking at a specific issue raised by an author and evaluate whether the author’s take is valid, invalid, or a mixture of valid and invalid. Then, you’ll explain your evaluation using information provided by at least three outside sources none of which can be over 10 years old (published before 2013).The second paper I’m asking you to complete is an “evaluative response paper” (or, in short, an “evaluation paper”). I’m asking you to read and respond to one of the sources below by writing a 3 to 4 page paper that evaluates the academic legitimacy of the paper. I’m asking you to engage in the “scholarly conversation” of a specific issue.
