In this week’s discussion, please evaluate Jonathan Rauch’s argument in “Kindly Inquisitors, Revisited.” What were some points you found convincing, and what points did you find questionable? Do you think he offers a stronger position than Rosenbaum? Which author has the stronger position, and why? Did Rauch change your mind at all on this topic, or offer you a different perspective to consider in some way?
Must be 250 words and free of spelling/grammar errors to receive full credit. Due Friday, 2/10.
