Explain the classical analysis of knowledge C.A.K (JTB), then, using a Gettier example, show why some believe that Justified True Belief isn’t sufficient for knowledge.

Words: 286
Pages: 2
Subject: Uncategorized

Hide Folder Information
Instructions
Exam #3 essay Questions

Follow the same requirements from Exam #1 (2-5 pages per question).

1. Determinism vs. Indeterminism

D’Holbach or Popper, pick either philosopher, state his position, as well as the argument given in support of that position. Include the main objections, as well as any possible replies.

2. Gettier Examples

Explain the classical analysis of knowledge C.A.K (JTB), then, using a Gettier example, show why some believe that Justified True Belief isn’t sufficient for knowledge.

3. Agrippa’s Trilemma

Agrippa’s Trilemma is used to show that in the end, none of our belief’s can ever be justified, and therefore we can never have knowledge. Foundational Internalism, Coherentism, and Abduction are three positions which aim to avoid the trilemma. Explain how the trilemma works, then pick one of these three positions and explain how it attempts to avoid the consequence of Agrippa’s Trilemma (of course, be sure to raise and respond to any objection to that position).

4. Art critics are people too, (sort of)? – Answer both parts.

A) Explain how Han Van Meegeren used forgery in order to force art critics into a dilemma, be sure to explain the dilemma.

B) How would someone like Susan Sontag respond to this dilemma?

5. The Doctrine of Temporal Parts

Let Us write for you! We offer custom paper writing services Order Now.

REVIEWS


Criminology Order #: 564575

“ This is exactly what I needed . Thank you so much.”

Joanna David.


Communications and Media Order #: 564566
"Great job, completed quicker than expected. Thank you very much!"

Peggy Smith.

Art Order #: 563708
Thanks a million to the great team.

Harrison James.


"Very efficient definitely recommend this site for help getting your assignments to help"

Hannah Seven