PHEPR Issue: One paragraph summarizing the issue, stating why it is important, and discussing why its relevant to understanding how to work with PHEP.
Rhetorical Context: One paragraph explaining the rhetorical context of the article. Specifically, determine the author(s) professional background(s), purpose of the journal or organization/agency that published the article, appeals or urgency the author(s) convey, and indications of bias.
Main Points of the Author(s): One paragraph explaining the ideas, arguments, and findings of the article.
Gaps in the Article: One paragraph explaining the gaps that exist in the article that may provide additional insight or challenge the main arguments.
Conclusion/Recommendation: One paragraph providing your conclusion and recommendation on the discussed issue(s). Be sure to demonstrate that youve considered the rhetorical context when developing your response to this section. Do you agree or disagree with the author(s)? Why?