Topic: How could contemporary diagnostic frameworks be improved? What would a revised system look like, or would it be optimal to get rid of them completely? Here′s a brief outline / stance: Introductory stance: Sinology is complex but valuable. I don′t think it would be optimal or wise to rid diagnostic frameworks entirely. Diagnostic frameworks have evolved, as they should And should continue to evolve.Prime example is DSM II to III, where Homosexuality was a “disorder” and then wasn’t. Body Ideas: – Discuss recommendations for the expansion of a diagnostic framework beyond what we currently have. What’s missing: Bio psycho social dimensions. Psychometric Testing, Cognitive Function Assessment, structured risk assessment – Critique the DSM-5 – Discuss RDoC as a good alternative but still not enough
