Use the following questions to guide your critique. Does the title clearly indicate what the research or study is about? Can you relate it to DM through the title? Explain. Summarize the study in one paragraph (about 200-250 words) Conduct research on the first three authors. Report on their professional and academic qualifications and state if they have previously published on this topic. If not try to explain how they would fit on this topic and in DM in general. Is the problem or the research questions/problems presented researchable? Is the problem leading to this publication important to justify this study? How can the information in this study be applied to you or your profession? Is the aim of the study clear and shows what the study wants to achieve? Is there any framework or theory of DM used or applied in any way? Do you find the information/data used relevant to the aim/question of the study? Are the study results relevant to DM processes? Do you agree with the conclusions made by the authors? Did the authors put emphasis on the most important results of the study? What are the two weaknesses and two strengths of this study? What would you have done to change this study, and why? In the conclusion, were there any new perspectives on the subject matter that were presented? Requirements: typed pages in Word using 12-point NTR font.
