In your peer responses, offer suggestions and other thoughts for your colleagues to consider. 1, Responds to this post in half a page use different reference to response please Folashade 1. Compare and contrast how a PHR and an electronic health record (EHR) influence health information exchange. Identify the advantages and disadvantages of having the two electronic records integrated with each other. Technology has enabled widespread connectivity and changes in healthcare delivery. Personal health records (PHR) and electronic health records (EHR) are critical components of patient information and diagnosis for many organizations. PHR will play a significant role in promoting health information exchange. For starters, they improve patients’ and healthcare providers’ access to information. This is especially important when dealing with emergency situations. PHR also enables direct communication between healthcare providers and patients. Furthermore, the communication takes place in a secure manner. As a result, it enables early intervention for a variety of ailments. Aside from the foregoing, EHR have a significant impact on health information exchange. First and foremost, they will enable the exchange of critical information between healthcare providers (Ohno-Machado, 2018). They also help to improve communication between patients and healthcare providers. They will also ensure that the information exchanged is accurate and up to date. When EHRs and PHRs are integrated, there are numerous advantages. It will improve patient-provider coordination, aid in the consolidation of healthcare information, and improve the way healthcare providers provide services. EHR and PHR systems can allow doctors and patients to check the patients lifelog information together on the EHR screen and prescribe lifestyle changes for patients. As a result, clinicians can review these data on the EHR’s PHR module interface and provide patients with health-related lifestyle management feedback during their visit to the clinic (Kim et al., 2019). Nonetheless, the disadvantage of the integration process is that it may increase administrative costs. 2. Professional use social media as an APRN to positively influence patient outcomes in the healthcare environment. Describe how a client’s culture may influence such processes. There are numerous ways for APRNs to use social media platforms to influence outcomes in the healthcare setting. To begin, nurses can use social media to stay up to date on research. This will assist nurses in learning about the best practices that can be used in the delivery of services. Second, APRNs can use social media to network with other healthcare professionals (Reinbeck & Antonacci, 2019). As a result, nurses will be able to share information and ideas about how to improve healthcare delivery. Third, APRNs can use social media to stay up to date on nursing trends. As a result, they will be aware of what nurses are doing differently and how it is influencing healthcare delivery. The client culture will have a significant impact on the process of utilizing social media. Are the clients, for example, comfortable using social media as a means of communication? How will cultural differences affect the use of social media? For example, what strategies will APRNs employ when dealing with language barriers? In addressing the concerns, APRNs will be able to use social media in a way that results in positive healthcare outcomes. 3. In your current role, discuss how you integrate assessing and educating patients on the safe use of information found on the Internet for making decisions about their health. Do you believe your current practices are sufficient? What do you do well? What could you change? If you do not currently assess and educate patients on the safe use of Internet retrieved health information, discuss how you may change your practices. One of the most difficult processes to teach people is how to use their critical thinking skills to distinguish between falsehoods and reality. Because there are so many sources of information, practitioners and healthcare organizations find it difficult to influence how clients receive it. In my current position, I assess and educate patients on the safe use of information found on the internet in a variety of ways. First, I try to educate the patient on how to find reliable information on the internet. This will be in terms of determining whether the sources were written by professionals and whether they were peer-reviewed. As a result, the patient will have access to accurate information. Second, it is to educate the patient on the fact that some of the interventions advocated for in online sources may not be applicable in practice settings. This is because each medical case is unique. In evaluating current practices, I do not believe they are adequate. There are a few minor changes that I believe should be made. For example, there is a need to educate patients about the privacy and confidentiality of their medical information. This is because certain sources will typically request personal information from the patient. Following that, such sources will use the information for their own purposes. Despite these flaws, I believe the current approach has done a good job of assisting patients in determining whether an online source is of high quality. It is critical to encourage practitioners to engage with patients and their families to determine whether technology is available to the patient and whether they can interact with the services provided by it. 4. Do you believe assessing patients’ knowledge of how to use the Internet safely should be a mandatory requirement for all healthcare institutions? Explain why. Yes, it is vital to ensure that assessing patient knowledge on the safe use of the internet is made mandatory in healthcare organizations. I believe it is vital for healthcare organizations to proactively engage with patients and assess the level of technical knowledge a patient has in navigating the internet safely and efficiently. This is because there are often issues to do with the accuracy of the information that has been obtained from the internet. Therefore, the patient might believe that certain interventions will work while it is not the case. There is also a need to ensure that patients do not self-medicate using the guidance of information which has been obtained from the internet. That is because such a practice might be associated with negative outcomes, such as adverse reactions to certain medications or interventions. Additionally, the patient might not be aware of the ways to protect the confidentiality of their information. That is if the online sources require the patient to offer their personal information. As shown above, there are many pitfalls that are associated with the use of online sources of information by the patients. That being the case, there is a need for measures that will be designed towards protecting the patients. For that reason, it makes sense to make sure that assessing patient knowledge on the safe use of the internet is made mandatory in healthcare organizations. References Kim, J. W., Ryu, B., Cho, S., Heo, E., Kim, Y., Lee, J., Jung, S. Y., & Yoo, S. (2019). Impact of Personal Health Records and Wearables on Health Outcomes and Patient Response: Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research mHealth and uHealth, 7(1), e12070. Ohno-Machado, L. (2018). Electronic health records and health information exchange. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(6), 617-617. Reinbeck, D., & Antonacci, J. (2019). How nurses can use social media to their advantage. Nursing, 49(5), 61-63. In your peer responses, offer suggestions and other thoughts for your colleagues to consider. 2, Responds to this post in half a page use different reference to response please jacky Electronic health records (EHR) and personal health records (PHR) have similarities and differences. EHR is an electronic version of the medical records generated by all the clinicians involved in the patient’s care. The EHR is an internal system within a health care organization. In addition, it is controlled and managed by the organization that contributes to them (Khader, 2020). The PHR, on the other hand, is meant to be owned, set up, and managed by patients. Furthermore, the PHR can be generated by physicians, hospitals, pharmacies, and other sources. It can be linked to the EHR or a stand-alone. The PHR allows patients to make more informed decisions regarding their health by reviewing their medical records. The EHR and PHR contain diagnoses, medications, immunizations, allergies, family medical history, and provider contacts (Khader, 2020). It would be far more beneficial if the two records were integrated. All providers and staff could access this information to treat a patient. The patient would not have to keep up with all of their medical records. The patient would benefit from a complete medical history allowing for more comprehensive medical treatment. In today’s Information Age, patients have access to the Internet and social media, which is a significant source of information. Many patients or health consumers have accepted ownership and responsibility for their health. Consumer health informatics has empowered and improved patient engagement in the shared decision-making process regarding their health (Hebda et al., 2017). Therefore, advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) can use social media to positively influence patient outcomes in the healthcare environment. APRNs have access to social networking platforms such as blogs, wikis, media-sharing sites, microblogs, and virtual reality and gaming environments which many health consumers see as more up-to-date, quicker, and easier to access than other media (Ventola, 2021). APRNs can share scientific, evidence-based information with patients that can be used to improve and enhance patient care, education and improve public health. In addition, the APRN can promote health behaviors, engage the patients, and debate health policies. Health consumer use of social media and the internet is strongly influenced by educational level, age, and socioeconomic status (Hebda et al., 2017). According to Hebda et al. (2017), social media and the internet does not impact senior citizens’ health decision the same. It is essential to assess and educate patients on the safe use of internet retrieval of health information. Patients have access to a wide range of health information that has the potential to influence their healthcare decisions and promote greater self-care. On the other hand, there is the potential for patients to access poor quality, biased, and inaccurate information that can undermine informed decision-making (Hebda et al., 2017). Providers should give guidance to help patients access and evaluate internet information that is accurate, up-to-date, and free of bias. Many nonprofit organizations help healthcare professionals and consumers evaluate and understand online health information, such as Health on the Net (HON). Although informing patients about internet safety is essential, it should not be a mandatory requirement for all healthcare institutions. There should be standards to prevent the propagation of inaccurate, biased, invalid, and outdated online health information (Hebda et al., 2017). Improving eHealth literacy among healthcare consumers cannot be the sole responsibility of healthcare institutions. References Hebda, T., Hunter, K., & Czar, P. (2019). Handbook of informatics for nurses and healthcare professionals. (6th ed.). Pearson. Khader, F. (2020). EMR, EHR, PHR: The actual difference between these 3 confusing terms. HODO Medical Informatics Solutions. Ventola, A. L. (2021). Social medical and health care professionals: Benefits, Risks, and best practice. Pharmacy and Therapeutics. .gov
