DISCUSS ON THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE BARRIERS THAT MOTHERS FACE TO EXCLUSIVE BREASTFEEDING OF INFANT IN THE FIRST SIX MONTHS OF LIFE.SUMMARY OF THE FEEDBACK 1.TITLE: Refers to this study as a systematic review but you have not performed a systematic review here. 2. ABSTRACT: Needs to improve on accademic language and structure. The abstract lacks an outline of the academic problem/gap. Overcoming the barriers is also not an academic aim and beyond the scope of there view. The method and results are not outlined at all, and the structure is lacking. References to UK specific recommendations but not a clear UK-specific focus to the study. 3. BACKGROUND: would benefit from more structure and justification for the research aim. It is not well argued why this systematic review is needed. The title is outlying a systematic review, but then in the literature review section and methods section, the study seems to indicates primary research. 4. METHODS: You have not performed a systematic review. You do not report any methodology to show that you have performed a systematic review. You have not followed PRISMA GUIDANCE, set search strategy to identify papers, used inclusion or exclusion criteria, extracted data from identified papers, assessed risk of bias etc. You have not followed the steps of a systematic review, as outlined in the systematic review sessions delivered on the course. YOU have not understood what a systematic review is. : You do not report results of a systematic review. You do not outlined what studies were identified, excluded and included and why, themes identified across papers, risk of bias assessment etc. 6. CONCLUSION: Very brief and does not give any conclusions relevant to a systematic review. 7. REFERENCES: Generally well structured, although page numbers are not required in text. 8. YOUR DISSERTATION is very brief, this is because you have not followed the methods or results reporting of a systematic review. PLEASE READ THE SUMMARY AND FOLLOW IT ACCORDINGLY.
