ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
1. Brief Slinger v. Sal-mart v. Hulme using the IRAC method that can be found in Appendix A of the course textbook. (Approximately one page)
2. Advise Newman as to whether the holding in Slinger v. Sal-mart v. Hulme would prevent him from successfully recovering money damages from Vandalay. (Approximately one page)
3. Do you think a contract should be enforced if one of the parties to the contract made a mistake about the meaning of the contract language? If so, why? If not, why not? Use a duty-based ethics theory to answer the question. Be sure to define the specific duty-based ethics theory (see Chapter 3 pp. 49-51) you use in your response. (½ – ¾ of a page).
Sources are attached:
1. The Slinger v. Sal-mart v. Hulme case
2. Course textbook:
a. Chapter 3: Ethics, pages 49 – 51.
b. Chapter 12: Contract Law: Releases, page 253
3. The hypothetical
