Case study (500-700 words): In Memphis, TN, debate coaches are surprised when the school district informs them that they’re not allowed to use a debate question from the National Debate Coaches Association focused on the question of environmental racism as revealed by lead in the water supply. This issue is especially relevant to many students, as many residents of Memphis deal with contaminated water, particularly Black and low-income residents. The school superintendent wishes to preempt any complaint under the state’s new anti-CRT law, believing it will distract from more pressing needs and concerns of the student body. But some coaches are skeptical about the level of caution being applied and what it means to restrict this information from students. The local debate league’s leadership board needs to reach an agreement about how to respond to the district’s decision.

Questions:

o As a member of the leadership board, how do you help the board reach a decision about how to respond?

o What values, principles, and practices guide your thinking?

o How do you help build consensus around whatever decision is reached?