Reading one:

As the author notes (p.7), “Clear-cut definitions of race are surprisingly elusive.” Identify the various definitions raised in the article. If race were simply a “fixed, biological category” would there not be consensus (agreement) as to the definition of race? If race were simply a “fixed, biological category” would it not be easy and clear-cut to assign individuals to their “natural” race?

However, as noted, consensus is lacking, and it is not easy to assign individuals to their “natural” race. What does this imply? Be specific and detailed.
Reading four:

The authors document the involvement of states and courts in defining race and assigning individuals to racial categories. Why does it matter which racial category an individual is assigned to? Be specific and detailed.
Please label and number your responses but submit them as a single discussion board post.