Employing this week’s reading assignments and ensuring your written responses are distinguishable from each other and follow the same sequence and order the questions are presented:
Discuss two key important functions of backgrounding or pre-employment screening, according to the learning resources this week
After thoroughly reading and evaluating the facts and evidence presented to the Court in this case, succinctly summarize how and why the court ruled in this matter involving negligent hiring, training, supervision, and job assignment.
Incorporate into your response, in specific terms, the language the court used to describe what information a “reasonable (background) investigation” would have included in this situation given the sensitivity of the circumstances.
As a security director, provide you own professional perspective of this ruling and how you would utilize the court findings to strengthen your organization’s employment screening and security training programs.
