Assignment Question

Situate the book of your choosing in the historical and political context of Post-Soviet Eurasia. What is the book including and excluding in its account? What else should be covered? What evidence is offered to support the claims of the book? Analyze its strengths, weaknesses, and points of interest. Is the argument convincing? Are there any other books that you would compare it to? Is the book of a certain genre? Does it offer a particularly imperial or post-imperial narrative? Ideally, the reader should gain insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the book, aided by input from the reviewer. The four stages of writing a book review are: introducing the book, outlining its contents, highlighting parts of the book by selecting particular chapters or themes, and giving a detailed evaluation.

Answer

Introduction

Masha Gessen’s book “The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia,” published in 2017, offers a comprehensive exploration of Russia’s political and societal evolution in the post-Soviet era. This essay aims to situate the book within the historical and political context of Post-Soviet Eurasia, evaluate its strengths and weaknesses, and analyze its contribution to our understanding of Russia’s trajectory. In addition to this, the essay will discuss the book’s genre, narrative style, and its potential comparability with other notable works on the subject.

Historical and Political Context

To appreciate the significance of “The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia” by Masha Gessen (2017), it is imperative to delve deeper into the historical and political milieu of Post-Soviet Eurasia. The book emerges as a crucial lens through which we can grasp the multifaceted transformations Russia underwent during this tumultuous period (Gessen, 2017).

The dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 marked a pivotal juncture in Russia’s history, signifying the end of decades of communist rule and the emergence of a new era. This transition was far from seamless; it was riddled with complexities and challenges. Russia, once a superpower, found itself grappling with the challenges of establishing a fledgling democracy (Gessen, 2017).

One of the defining features of this era was economic instability. The shift from a centrally planned economy to a market-oriented one was accompanied by hardships for many Russians. Hyperinflation, unemployment, and a decline in living standards were among the economic challenges that the population faced (Gessen, 2017).

The political landscape was equally turbulent. The emergence of a multiparty system and the struggle to establish democratic institutions led to a political environment characterized by uncertainty and shifting power dynamics. The early post-Soviet years saw a series of political crises, including the constitutional crisis of 1993 (Gessen, 2017).

Moreover, social upheaval played a significant role in shaping the context of the book. The disintegration of the Soviet Union led to the emergence of new national identities and cultural dynamics. It also saw the rise of civil society and grassroots movements, as well as challenges to traditional values and norms (Gessen, 2017).

These intricate dynamics laid the foundation for the subsequent events chronicled in Gessen’s book. The book delves into the consequences of this tumultuous period, particularly the rise of Vladimir Putin and the resurgence of authoritarianism in Russia. By understanding the historical and political context, readers can better grasp the challenges and complexities that Gessen’s narrative seeks to unravel (Gessen, 2017).

Contents of the Book

“The Future Is History” is divided into four parts, each focusing on the lives of four individuals who represent different aspects of Russia’s post-Soviet experience (Gessen, 2017). Gessen explores the lives of a young gay man, a political activist, a wealthy businessman, and a psychologist. Through their personal stories, she paints a vivid picture of Russia’s transformation and the erosion of democratic ideals (Gessen, 2017).

One of the strengths of the book is its in-depth analysis of the psychological and societal factors that contributed to the return of totalitarianism in Russia (Gessen, 2017). Gessen argues that Russia’s inability to come to terms with its Soviet past, coupled with economic inequality and social conservatism, paved the way for Putin’s authoritarian regime. The book offers a compelling narrative that highlights the complex interplay of politics, psychology, and culture in shaping Russia’s trajectory (Gessen, 2017).

Strengths and Weaknesses

One of the strengths of Gessen’s book is her ability to humanize the larger political and historical narrative (Gessen, 2017). By focusing on individual stories, she makes the complex history of Post-Soviet Russia more relatable and engaging for the reader. Additionally, her analysis of the psychological underpinnings of Russia’s political choices adds a unique dimension to the book (Gessen, 2017).

However, one potential weakness of the book is its limited scope (Gessen, 2017). While it provides a detailed account of the early 2000s and the rise of Putin, it does not delve as deeply into more recent developments in Russian politics. The book also tends to be critical of Russia without offering a more balanced perspective on the country’s complexities (Gessen, 2017).

Evidence and Arguments

Masha Gessen’s “The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia” (2017) stands as a testament to meticulous research and a profound commitment to providing a nuanced account of Russia’s post-Soviet transformation. Throughout the book, Gessen employs a multifaceted approach to substantiate her claims and paint a vivid portrait of Russia’s evolving political landscape (Gessen, 2017).

Gessen’s use of extensive research is evident in her incorporation of historical documents, academic studies, and firsthand accounts. By drawing upon these diverse sources, she crafts a compelling narrative that captures the complexity of Russia’s journey from democracy to authoritarianism (Gessen, 2017). Historical documents offer readers a glimpse into the official records and policies that shaped the nation’s political trajectory. Academic studies provide a scholarly foundation for her arguments, ensuring that her analysis is grounded in rigorous research. Furthermore, firsthand accounts bring a human dimension to the narrative, allowing readers to connect with the individuals whose lives were profoundly impacted by the political changes in Russia.

However, it’s essential to acknowledge that some critics have raised concerns about the book’s reliance on anecdotal evidence and personal stories. While these personal narratives humanize the larger political narrative and make it more accessible to a general audience, they may raise questions about the book’s academic rigor (Gessen, 2017). Critics argue that the heavy emphasis on personal stories could potentially compromise the book’s objectivity and scholarly depth. It’s crucial for readers to approach the book with an understanding of its narrative approach, appreciating both its strengths in accessibility and its potential limitations in terms of scholarly rigor.

Genre and Narrative Style

“The Future Is History” belongs to the genre of narrative nonfiction (Gessen, 2017). In this work, Gessen masterfully combines personal narratives with historical analysis, creating a captivating and relatable narrative that draws readers into the tumultuous world of post-Soviet Russia. This narrative style enhances the book’s accessibility, making it engaging even for those not well-versed in Russian history and politics.

Gessen’s decision to employ narrative nonfiction is a deliberate choice to reach a broader audience and bring the human experiences at the heart of her narrative to the forefront. By weaving together personal stories with historical analysis, she provides readers with a more intimate understanding of the individuals who lived through Russia’s political changes (Gessen, 2017). This genre choice invites readers to empathize with the challenges and triumphs of ordinary Russians during this transformative period.

However, it’s important to recognize that this narrative approach may raise questions about the book’s objectivity and scholarly rigor. While it excels in accessibility, it may not provide the same level of depth and analysis as a strictly academic work. Readers should approach “The Future Is History” with an awareness of its narrative style, appreciating its ability to engage while considering its potential limitations in terms of scholarly depth (Gessen, 2017).

Comparative Analysis

In the realm of literature on Post-Soviet Russia, “The Future Is History” by Masha Gessen distinguishes itself through its profound emphasis on the personal and psychological dimensions of the country’s transformation during the post-Soviet era (Gessen, 2017). While other notable works, such as Timothy Snyder’s “The Road to Unfreedom” (2018) and Serhii Plokhy’s “The Gates of Europe” (2015), provide invaluable historical and geopolitical perspectives, Gessen’s book offers a uniquely intimate exploration of the human experiences that have significantly shaped Russia’s complex political landscape (Gessen, 2017).

Snyder’s “The Road to Unfreedom” provides a broader geopolitical perspective on Russia’s actions and ambitions on the global stage, examining the ideological and political forces that have driven the country’s policies. Plokhy’s “The Gates of Europe,” on the other hand, offers a detailed historical account of Ukraine’s complex relationship with Russia and its role in shaping Eastern European geopolitics.

In contrast, Gessen’s work hones in on the individual lives and stories of Russian citizens, providing a compelling narrative that captures the essence of their struggles, aspirations, and the psychological factors that have contributed to the resurgence of authoritarianism in Russia (Gessen, 2017). By delving into the personal narratives of a young gay man, a political activist, a wealthy businessman, and a psychologist, Gessen humanizes the larger political and historical narrative, making it more relatable and engaging for readers (Gessen, 2017).

In this regard, “The Future Is History” offers a distinct vantage point that complements the broader geopolitical and historical perspectives provided by other works. While Snyder and Plokhy shed light on the external forces and historical context, Gessen’s book illuminates the internal struggles, aspirations, and societal dynamics that underpin Russia’s political transformation (Gessen, 2017).

Conclusion

In conclusion, Masha Gessen’s “The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia” offers a valuable and unique perspective on the political and societal changes in Post-Soviet Eurasia. It situates the book within the historical and political context, assesses its strengths and weaknesses, and discusses its genre and narrative style. While the book may have some limitations, it undeniably contributes to our understanding of Russia’s complex journey from democracy to authoritarianism and provides a compelling account of the human experiences that shaped this transformation. For readers seeking a nuanced and personal exploration of Post-Soviet Russia, “The Future Is History” is a recommended read.

References

Gessen, M. (2017). The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia. Riverhead Books.

Plokhy, S. (2015). The Gates of Europe: a History of Ukraine. Basic Books.

Snyder, T. (2018). The Road to Unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. Tim Duggan Books.

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)